Rogue docs' penalty too light

ROGUE doctors have been getting away too lightly for behaviour that would be considered criminal in others. 

Ordinary folk who traffic in depressant drugs such as Erimin and Dormicum face up to 10 years' jail and five strokes of the cane. 

In 2002, a 17-year-old girl was jailed for two years for trafficking in 30 tablets of Erimin. 

But the worst that can happen to a doctor who doles out hundreds of Erimin pills to  

a patient is a S$10,000 (RM22,000) fine and a life-long ban from medical practice. 

One doctor is known to have given 210 Dormicum tablets in 19 days to one patient; 430 tablets in 138 days to a second; and 160 tablets in 31 days to a third. 

This should no longer be called prescription but trafficking. 

The doctor in question was suspended from practice for nine months. Other doctors have received more severe penalties. Some were even banned from practising medicine for life.  

It is likely that they were doling out even more pills. 

Such details are not made public, unless they form part of the charges against the doctor, as the proceedings of the Singapore Medical Council's disciplinary committee are confidential. 

But why should such doctors be protected by the mantle of a profession to which they bring disrepute? 

The council, the profession's watchdog, has condemned such actions as reckless disregard for patients' well-being and abuse of professional privilege. 

The council told one doctor: “Proper prescribing by doctors is a statutory privilege and carries with it a heavy responsibility.  

“This responsibility must be safeguarded in the interest of public welfare.” 

The council fined an errant doctor S$65,000 (RM144,000), but the High Court had to cut it to S$10,000 (RM22,000) on appeal because the council had exceeded its powers under the Medical Registration Act. 

That doctor, Chia Yang Pong, sole licensee of the Grace Polyclinic chain, had a total of 65 charges against him. 

The council ruled that he had dispensed the drug to patients “without any regard to their medical conditions, health, interest, or harm that might come to them”. He was struck off the register and banned from medical practice for life. 

But no matter how much a doctor supplies to patients, the Central Narcotics Bureau cannot act against him as doctors are legally allowed to give patients drugs. 

It is time that the health and home affairs ministries got together to review the laws governing doctors when they abuse the trust put on them. 

Doctors do need some protection, because of the work they do. But this protection should extend to only those who are conscientiously doing their job.  

And not to those who over-prescribe pills that can cause addiction, memory loss, organ failure and death. – The Straits Times/Asia News Network  

Article type: metered
User Type: anonymous web
User Status:
Campaign ID: 1
Cxense type: free
User access status: 3

Next In Regional

Chinese TikTok influencers apologise for videos of lavish spending including a US$1,500 haircut, US$53,000 bed and a US$61,000 suit
Amazon’s clash with Tencent killed its Lord Of The Rings video game after the Chinese tech giant acquired Leyou
China tech stampede into electric cars sparks auto sector buzz
Japanese shares slump as virus surge stokes slowdown worries
Ringgit opens higher as crude oil prices stabilise
Scrutiny of Tesla crash a sign that regulation may be coming
Nasa's Mars helicopter succeeds in historic first flight
BYD launches new open-source EV product platform
India's Modi scorned over reckless rallies, religious gathering amid virus mayhem
Local uprisings emerge to challenge Myanmar's army

Stories You'll Enjoy