How global firms are falling short on forest protection vows


By AGENCY

Green forest view from the top of Sulphur Mountain in Banff, Alberta in Canada. European voters and consumers are making it increasingly clear that they no longer want to buy products that are responsible for deforestation or forest degradation. Photo: AFP

Global companies and financial institutions with the highest potential for curbing deforestation are largely failing to do so, undermining pledges to protect forests made at the COP26 climate summit last November, a report said recently.

The Forest 500 analysis by non-profit research group Global Canopy graded 350 companies most responsible for producing, using or trading commodities that drive deforestation, along with the 150 biggest banks, investment firms and pension funds that finance them.

One in three companies assessed had no forest commitments at all, and 72% addressed some but not all of the forest-related commodities in their supply chains.

Save 30% OFF The Star Digital Access

Monthly Plan

RM 13.90/month

RM 9.73/month

Billed as RM 9.73 for the 1st month, RM 13.90 thereafter.

Best Value

Annual Plan

RM 12.33/month

RM 8.63/month

Billed as RM 103.60 for the 1st year, RM 148 thereafter.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Next In Living

Why do Malaysians love blind boxes? We unbox the psychology behind the trend
Harvey Norman Brings Your Dream Kitchen To Life
Why Malaysians are going head over heels for blind boxes
Why this US student with cerebral palsy was crowned homecoming king
Searching for links between a changing climate and mental health in Kenya
Shouting at seagulls keeps them away from your food, research shows
Charles and Diana's rare wedding champagne to be auctioned
Japanese firms boost support for workers with disabilities
Why this Malaysian musical event honoured neurodiverse performers
Add lightning to the list of things that could kill you on Mars

Others Also Read