US CEOs dig in against more reform


  • Business
  • Saturday, 21 Jun 2003

NEW YORK: US chief executives, labouring under scores of new rules to prevent future corporate catastrophes like WorldCom and Enron, are digging in, unwilling to cede more ground to corporate governance reformers. 

New battle lines have been drawn – a year after costly scandals drove the stock market to five-year lows and crippled institutional and retail portfolios – in the debate over a proposed rule change that would give shareholders a much greater say in nominating directors. 

More broadly, the nomination issue has companies, their advisers and critics wrestling with the question: How much more regulation is required to prevent another simultaneous failure of corporate ethics, regulatory oversight and accountant accountability? 

“None of this is free. The cost of auditing fees, attestations, the (rising directors and officers) premiums,” said Pat Rondeax, partner with Hale & Dorr. “This time and expense has not been dripping out, but has been like a dam bursting, and companies are feeling a bit distracted from delivering value to shareholders.” 

The Business Roundtable (BRT), America’s leading CEO group, has been stirred to action by Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) chairman William Donaldson’s effort to bring greater democracy to the proxy process. Its reaction ends a year of conspicuous silence in corporate governance issues. 

The CEOs argue that all the new rules are enough. 

“I think everyone is asking how much is enough, and what the industry standard and best practices are going to be,” said Isaac Lustgarten, a lawyer in the New York office of Arnold & Porter. 

The CEO opposition, detailed in a BRT letter to the SEC last week, comes after an extraordinary outpouring of rules and regulations – the legislative response to WorldCom Inc and other corporate scandals that essentially recast 60 years of established securities law. 

Right now, the nomination of new board members is solely the province of the board nominating committee.  

If “democratisation” efforts are successful, shareholders with large stakes, such as 3%, could place board nominees on the proxy. 

Labour unions and state retirement plans support the SEC initiative, but the BRT has been joined by the National Association of Corporate Directors, among others, in opposing it. 

The SEC has requested that the staff make a recommendation on the issue by July 15. – Reuters  

Article type: metered
User Type: anonymous web
User Status:
Campaign ID: 1
Cxense type: free
User access status: 3
Join our Telegram channel to get our Evening Alerts and breaking news highlights
   

Next In Business News

S&P affirms Malaysia's sovereign credit ratings
Sunway to sell stake in healthcare unit to GIC -sources
Serba Dinamik takes auditor KPMG to court
Daibochi reports steady Q3 results, warns rising costs may impact prospect�
Genting, Digi underpin FBM KLCI rebound
Pay-TV company Astro delivers nearly double net profit in Q1
BNM's international reserves rise to US$111bil as at June 15
Oil rises on optimism of quick recovery in global demand
Chipmaker GlobalFoundries plans US$6bil expansion in Singapore, US, Germany
RHB Group's green financing grows to RM3.25bil YTD

Stories You'll Enjoy


Vouchers