Sodomy II: Anwar’s defence questions existence of lubricant


PUTRAJAYA: The defence in Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's appeal has questioned whether there was penetration in the alleged sodomy case, as Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan's testimony was inconsistent with regards to the existence of a commonly-used sexual lubricant.

Lawyer Datuk Seri Gopal Sri Ram, a former Federal Court judge, argued that according to the evidence from the complainant Mohd Saiful at the High Court, the act was vigorous and fast and he suffered pain in his anus and stomach. 

Play, subscribe and stand a chance to win prizes worth over RM39,000! T&C applies.

Monthly Plan

RM 13.90/month

RM 11.12/month

Billed as RM 11.12 for the 1st month, RM 13.90 thereafter.

Best Value

Annual Plan

RM 12.33/month

RM 9.87/month

Billed as RM 118.40 for the 1st year, RM 148 thereafter.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Next In Nation

Thunderstorms and heavy rain forecast for seven states
‘WFH rollout could include 200,000 public servants’
Arthur: Be ready for heat, dry spell till June
King and Queen extend Vaisakhi, Tamil New Year wishes
‘M’sia facing STEM talent shortage’
Influencers cook up trouble for overworked hotpot shop owner
Measures to contain fallout
‘Inaction against sexual harassment not acceptable’
Tamils and Malayalees welcome new year with prayers
El Nino threatens water quality

Others Also Read