X Close

Online Exclusive

Making Progress

Monday, 27 February 2017 | MYT 1:55 PM

Political discourse in the age of fake news and alternative facts

White House spokesman Sean Spicer (L) and adviser Kellyanne Conway wait for the arrival of US President Donald Trump under the wing of Air Force One at Andrews Air Force Base in Maryland on January 26, 2017 as he departs to attend a Republican retreat in Philadelphia.- AFP PHOTO

White House spokesman Sean Spicer (L) and adviser Kellyanne Conway wait for the arrival of US President Donald Trump under the wing of Air Force One at Andrews Air Force Base in Maryland on January 26, 2017 as he departs to attend a Republican retreat in Philadelphia.- AFP PHOTO

"Alternative facts" was a phrase used by U.S. Counselor to the President Kellyanne Conway during a NBC Meet the Press interview on January 22, 2017, in which she defended White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer's highly questionable statement about the attendance at Donald Trump's inauguration as President of the United States.

The use of the term invited strong rebukes because “alternative facts” are not facts but falsehoods.

Traditional political forces have to think long and hard over the level and standard of political discourse in the age of “alternative facts.”

Over the weekend, I was invited as a participant for the annual consultative meeting of the Council of Asian Liberals and Democrats (CALD) that is currently headed by Abhisit Vejjajiva, former Prime Minister of Thailand and leader of the Democrat Party.

We deliberated at length on the challenges posed by political populism that is sweeping nations from the United States of America to France and the Philippines.

How do conventional political forces react to populists who have little regard for the truth and facts but draw their support by amplifying the insecurities of the people and thriving in the fault lines of politics as opposed to rising above them.

How do we fight with one hand tied behind our back as we seek to call out those who purvey fake news with the sole intention of enamouring their audience?

How do conventional political forces stem their decline of support as any attempt to repudiate the populists is countered with the admonition that the traditionalists seek to maintain the status quo and are elitists and out of touch?

However, before we seek to answer such questions, there is a deep underlying problem that compels one to ask: does truth even matter? Do facts change people’s minds or most people believe what they want to believe? These questions also have particular relevance to Malaysia, more so as we enter election season.

An article in the Economist magazine, published on 10th September 2016 sheds some light on the phenomenon of “post-truth” politics and I quote:

“Mr Trump is the leading exponent of “post-truth” politics—a reliance on assertions that “feel true” but have no basis in fact. His brazenness is not punished, but taken as evidence of his willingness to stand up to elite power.

And he is not alone. Members of Poland’s government assert that a previous president, who died in a plane crash, was assassinated by Russia. Turkish politicians claim the perpetrators of the recent bungled coup were acting on orders issued by the CIA.

The successful campaign for Britain to leave the European Union warned of the hordes of immigrants that would result from Turkey’s imminent accession to the union.”

In an article recently published in the New Yorker Magazine entitled “Why facts don’t change our mind,” there is a robust discussion on how facts do not change our minds rather we rely on intuition or our own beliefs in judging whether a particular assertion is correct or not.

The article also explains a study by Steven Sloman, a professor at Brown University, and Philip Fernbach, a professor at the University of Colorado, who are cognitive scientists and I quote:

“As a rule, strong feelings about issues do not emerge from deep understanding,” Sloman and Fernbach write. And here our dependence on other minds reinforces the problem. If your position on, say, the Affordable Care Act is baseless and I rely on it, then my opinion is also baseless.

When I talk to Tom and he decides he agrees with me, his opinion is also baseless, but now that the three of us concur we feel that much more smug about our views. If we all now dismiss as unconvincing any information that contradicts our opinion, you get, well, the Trump Administration … “This is how a community of knowledge can become dangerous,” Sloman and Fernbach observe.”

The unwillingness to subject our opinions to thorough examination and alternative views results in the development of opinions that are factually flawed and further perpetuates divisions in society because it is anchored in our deep seated prejudices and what we want to believe as opposed to actually what is factually accurate.

The recent debate on immunization of children in Malaysia is an example of a dogged hesitancy to accept medically sound evidence that immunization is good for the health and mental development of children as those opposing immunization choose to believe facts that are not proven because their minds are conditioned and they believe what they want to believe regardless any evidence to the contrary.

Last Saturday, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak warned of peddlers of “fake news” who seek to undermine and destroy the country. Najib said that falsehoods masquerading as “news” is an insidious attack that targets the hearts and minds of Malaysians.

If left unchecked, “fake news” would have a debilitating effect on Malaysians as the ability to differentiate what is right and wrong is an essential component of democracy as the electorate must only take decisions when they have all the facts and that too the correct ones.

Political discourse has always been a tricky subject and Malaysia is no exception. Pakatan Harapan politicians have made all sorts of ludicrous claims from exclaiming that the nation is going to be bankrupt, to casting doubt on the financial health of the Employees Provident Fund (EPF) and use questionable facts and figures to poke holes into the economic management of the country; just to name a few of the many incidents one can encounter.

It would be wise and imperative for Malaysians and others to question what they are told, verify what they read and double check what they hear before making a conclusion given that we live in an age where any individual with a Facebook or twitter account can post something on their timeline and claim it is news with no one else able to independently determine the veracity of what has been said. Only then legitimate political discourse can survive the age of “fake news” and “alternative facts.”

Tags / Keywords: making progress

More Articles

Filter by

The value of political stability

3 August 2017

It is better to stick with a tried and tested political movement and appreciate the value of political stability.

Does Pakatan Harapan really represent hope?

18 July 2017

Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad is known to be both methodical and mercurial. He remains Malaysia's longest-serving prime minister but has turned against the party that sustained him for his entire political career and is cavorting with former political rivals whom in the past he derided as anti-national.

Time to regulate social media?

1 July 2017

Social media has been both a boon and a bane. On one hand, it has democratised information, connected billions of people, allowed people to create awareness on current issues, allowed government and agencies to reach out to the people and even made education more accessible.

Individual responsibility must count

16 May 2017

Malaysians have a penchant for blaming everyone but themselves for everything that goes wrong, and one of the constant targets is the government.

Be the change you want to see in the world

20 April 2017

Mahathma Gandhi remains one of the most iconic figures of history. Gandhi was a diminutive man with ​enormous fortitude; he stared down one of the largest empires in history and won India’s independence without firing a single bullet.

- AFP pic

Brexit and the global liberal order

5 April 2017

Those who support Brexit have been cheering this moment and billed it a return of "sovereignty". However, many forget the good the EU has done.

TN50: Building the economy of tomorrow

19 March 2017

The entire country is captivated by the discourse on the 2050 National Transformation (TN50) initiative. There is a palpable feeling of excitement over the deliberations on where we see our country in the year 2050.

We need to get serious about sexual crimes

9 February 2017

One of my favourite pastimes is watching television dramas and I have a particular predisposition for British television dramas because I have always found them to be riveting and exciting.

Why minorities matter

19 January 2017

IN the past year, we have witnessed political, social, economic and cultural upheaval with a common thread being a push back against immigration and more specifically minorities in countries that have long termed themselves liberal democracies.

  • Page 1 of 1

Go to page:


More Columnists