It was admittedly not the best of speeches in English. Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi had difficulty pronouncing some big words and he wasn’t a smooth talker. But at least he tried, instead of turning to his familiar Bahasa Malaysia which would have been an easier option.
THE Deputy Prime Minister has never hidden the fact that he needs to improve his command of the English language. In fact, he openly tells his friends that he has to brush up his English now that he needs to speak at international meetings.
So it comes as no surprise if his English speaking skills at the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) last week were not exactly posh or smooth.
Let’s face it – Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi is not the product of a British boarding school, nor is he from an elite university. He did not even have the benefit of studying at a missionary school, where English was the medium of instruction.
Dr Ahmad Zahid came from an entirely different background. His parents were not aristocrats nor were they from a lineage of Umno leaders. He wasn’t born with a silver spoon in his mouth, so to speak.
He had his primary education at SK Sungai Balai, his secondary education at SM Agama Izuddin Shah in Ipoh and then at SMK Tengku Ampuan Rahimah in Klang.
These are not schools in the same category as St John’s Institution, St Xavier’s Institution, Penang Free School or the Royal Military College.
Like it or not, his maiden speech at the UNGA has become the subject of controversy on social media, with some taking potshots at his purported lack of English proficiency.
Despite his experience as an orator, he seemed somewhat uncomfortable on the international platform and had a little difficulty handling some of the terminologies and the pronunciation of words he perhaps does not use on a regular basis.
However, I think Malaysians should give him credit for trying. His message was easily understood by most of us.
He could have easily used Bahasa Malaysia, played the nationalistic card and claimed that he was the first Malaysian leader to use the national language at the UN.
He could even have quoted Quranic verses to push his religious credentials. After all, such messages were meant for a Malaysian audience.
But he chose English – the more difficult option. Yes, he has been ridiculed, but he shouldn’t give up. Practice makes perfect and from now on, he should try and deliver as many speeches as possible in English.
He need not listen to PAS vice-president Iskandar Samad, who has been quoted as saying that Dr Ahmad Zahid shouldn’t have given his address in English.
He reportedly said that many other leaders of countries where English is not the native language would not think of using English at the UN, as they are always proud of their own language.
Iskandar’s opinion is a classic case of hypocrisy, a disease which afflicts many of our politicians. He wrote his comments in English “for the benefit of Facebook friends all over the world.”
But that is the point. If the DPM had used BM, he would not have reached the entire planet. Unlike the UN, most people don’t have a translator at hand and like it or not, English is the world’s common language.
Iskandar should know that even at World Cup football matches, the referees use English, even if it’s “half-past six,” or “half-baked” as we often say.
True, Dr Ahmad Zahid’s English is heavily Malay-accented. But then again, UN secretary-general Ban Ki-moon’s English is also Korean accented, and the same applies to leaders from India despite their strong grounding in English.
If there’s one point in this episode we must concede, it is this – English, whether written or spoken, is terribly important, but we are losing the edge we once had. Teachers who have failed in their English tests are teaching our children English and that is a frightening fact.
The same hypocritical leaders who tell Malaysians to send our children to national schools are also packing their own children off to boarding schools in the UK or to private and international schools right here in Malaysia.
It isn’t the erroneous claim of vernacular or national schools causing disunity that we should be worried about.
The issue that we all should be concerned about is the declining standard of education in Malaysia in general, and that includes the shocking standard of English taught in our schools, or rather the lack of it.
Most of us cringe with embarrassment at the kind of English posted on Facebook by some of our ministers. It is horrendous and no one seems to be telling them to correct it before their reputations are further damaged. A few seem totally incapable of speaking English at all.
However, those who laugh at Dr Ahmad Zahid should first ask themselves whether their command of Bahasa Malaysia is any good as well, let alone deliver an entire speech in the national language.
These are the sort of Malaysians who turn up at government departments, using English and expecting the clerks to be able to reply in crisp Queen’s English. And when they can’t, they express shock and dismay, followed by harsh criticism.
In Belgium, Switzerland or Holland, people are able to converse proficiently in a few European languages, including English.
Many Malaysians, on the other hand, lack that multi-lingual ability, and those in rural areas are at times ridiculed when they try to speak English.
Therefore, Mr Deputy Prime Minister, ignore the criticism and continue to speak English. In fact, make more speeches in English!
Already a subscriber? Log in
Get 20% OFF The Star Digital Access
Cancel anytime. Ad-free. Unlimited access with perks.
