RECENT public opinion concerning Investor State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) provisions, including those discussed in recent negotiations of the Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA), centres on a number of issues.
Notwithstanding, an objective analysis of the system and the need for a paradigm evolution is essential before there can be criticism of a system that has provided the modern legal framework for foreign investment across the globe.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Get 20% OFF The Star Digital Access
Cancel anytime. Ad-free. Unlimited access with perks.
