Regulate global investment disputes inonomy


RECENT public opinion concerning Investor State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) provisions, including those discussed in recent negotiations of the Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA), centres on a number of issues.

Notwithstanding, an objective analysis of the system and the need for a paradigm evolution is essential before there can be criticism of a system that has provided the modern legal framework for foreign investment across the globe.

Limited time offer:
Just RM5 per month.

Monthly Plan

RM13.90/month
RM5/month

Billed as RM5/month for the 1st 6 months then RM13.90 thereafters.

Annual Plan

RM12.33/month

Billed as RM148.00/year

1 month

Free Trial

For new subscribers only


Cancel anytime. No ads. Auto-renewal. Unlimited access to the web and app. Personalised features. Members rewards.
Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Opinion , Letters

   

Next In Letters

IR4.0: Closing the digital gaps
Quest to eradicate malaria not over yet
Recipe to attain success
Regulatory oversight needed for charity organisations
Gilley's remarks disrespect Malaysia's stance on Israel-Palestine conflict, says MCA Youth leader
Should we blame it all on plastic?
Climate’s effects on work
There are economic benefits from waste
Cultivating good mental health starts from young
Working on safeguarding cross-border data transfer

Others Also Read