Exceptions to double jeopardy protection


A MALAYSIAN citizen, who was convicted in Canada of sexually assaulting dozens of women in Toronto, served out his 24-year sentence and was then deported to Malaysia. Understandably, there were demands from many concerned Malaysians to act against him in order to prevent any repeat of the heinous crimes.

These calls draw our attention to the constitutional prohibition in Article 7(2) against “double jeopardy”. There is also the fact that the offender’s crimes were committed outside our country and outside the jurisdiction of our courts.

Win a prize this Mother's Day by subscribing to our annual plan now! T&C applies.

Monthly Plan

RM13.90/month

Annual Plan

RM12.33/month

Billed as RM148.00/year

1 month

Free Trial

For new subscribers only


Cancel anytime. No ads. Auto-renewal. Unlimited access to the web and app. Personalised features. Members rewards.
Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Opinion , Shad Faruqi , columnist

   

Next In Columnists

Accusations start to fly in KKB
Cash cannot be king in polls
Indonesia lives the dream – while Malaysia dreams on
Chinese look too good, but do not write off the gritty Malaysians
Woe if 24-hour eateries shut
A music-filled Syawal
Honoured, but who remembers?
Separate dreams in KKB by-election
Diverse wonders of the Balkans
League leaders, set-piece mastery and other drama

Others Also Read