Two people hold placards at a rally protesting the Australian government's treatment of Sri Lankan asylum-seekers in Sydney. - AFP PHOTO / Willliam WEST
SYDNEY: Asylum-seekers held on an Australian customs vessel at sea for weeks were given lifeboats and told to make their own way back to India, a lawyer for the group said.
The boatload of 157, whom lawyer Hugh de Kretser said yesterday were mostly Christian Tamils fleeing persecution in Sri Lanka, set sail from India hoping to get to Australia.
“The clients we spoke to were absolutely terrified at what lay ahead for them,” said de Kretser, who is executive director of the Human Rights Law Centre.
“They were terrified of the prospect of being dumped in the ocean on lifeboats without experience in navigating or operating a boat and having to take responsibility for the families that were on the boat.”
The group, including 50 children, was picked up by Australian authorities towards the end of June.
They spent weeks on a customs boat, mostly locked in windowless rooms, before they were taken to Australia around July 25, their lawyers said.
Immigration Minister Scott Morrison, who claimed they were mostly economic migrants, said they could be returned to India – even if not citizens of that country – under an agreement with New Delhi.
But all of them refused interviews with Indian consular officials on Australian soil and were instead transferred to a detention camp on the Pacific island of Nauru.
Morrison has previously refused to detail “on water” operations of Operation Sovereign Borders, the government’s policy designed to break people-smuggling and stop asylum boats.
Asked last week whether the group were offered orange lifeboats, he told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation: “I don’t discuss those sorts of operational matters.”
De Kretser said after interviews with 15 of the 107 adults onboard, it appeared that nine of them were separated from the others while they were still on the customs vessel and told how to use the lifeboats.
They were instructed in English that there would be 50 to 60 people on each boat and that they would have to navigate them back to India.
“When they refused, saying they had no experience in operating or navigating a boat and couldn’t take responsibility for ensuring the safety of those onboard, the officers told them it was an Australian government decision and they had to obey,” he said.
De Kretser said access to the group had been extremely limited, but said some told him they had been living in India for less than six months when they made the voyage.
He said they had spoken of a precarious existence in India, where they were unable to work and their children could not attend school.
Under Australia’s hardline policy for asylum-seekers, designed to prevent deaths at sea, those arriving by boat are sent to Papua New Guinea and Nauru and denied resettlement in Australia even if found to be genuine refugees.
Canberra also has a policy of turning boats back when it is safe to do so, while asylum-seekers coming ashore in Indonesia have claimed Australian authorities put them on lifeboats and turned them back.
De Kretser said it was not known why the lifeboat plan was not put into effect. — AFP