Feuding law firms in Facebook antitrust case told to make peace

FILE PHOTO: Facebook app logo is seen in this illustration taken, August 22, 2022. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo

(Reuters) - A U.S. judge on Tuesday appointed two prominent U.S. law firms as co-leaders of consumer claims against Meta Platforms Inc's Facebook, saying he hoped they would put aside their dispute over control of the antitrust case and work together.

In a court order, U.S. District Judge James Donato in San Francisco appointed Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro and Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan with "some reservations" given the past "rocky relationship" between the two law firms.

"It is the court's expectation that the attorneys will treat this appointment as the start of a new day, and put behind them the conflicts that gave rise to these proceedings," Donato wrote.

The case involves a group of consumers who contend Facebook exploited user data to maintain its market power. The company has denied the claims.

Law firms routinely vie for sole or co-leadership roles in high-profile class actions, since such appointments by judges can help steer cases and earn firms bigger cuts of legal fees.

Hagens Berman partner Shana Scarlett and Quinn Emanuel partner Kevin Teruya, the two lawyers appointed to represent a prospective consumer class, did not immediately respond to messages seeking comment.

Representatives for Quinn Emanuel and Facebook declined to comment, and a spokesperson for Hagens Berman did not immediately respond to a message seeking comment.

Scarlett in recent court filings said Quinn Emanuel was not respecting her view as a leading antitrust attorney based on her gender.

Quinn Emanuel denied the claim, saying it has "worked very hard to be cooperative with all counsel on the case, including female counsel."

Both firms had been appointed co-counsel in 2021 by a judge who has since been elevated to a U.S. appeals court.

Donato started the appointment process from scratch in January amid quarreling between Seattle-based plaintiffs' firm Hagens Berman and 900-lawyer Quinn Emanuel.

The firms sought individual, sole appointment and not co-leadership.

Donato said in Tuesday's order that the designation of co-leadership was interim and that "further reports of dysfunctionality or breakdowns in the work relationship" would likely result in designation of new counsel.

The case is Klein v. Meta Platforms Inc, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 5:20-cv-08570.

For consumer class: Shana Scarlett of Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro; Kevin Teruya of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan

For Facebook: Sonal Mehta, David Gringer and Ari Holtzblatt of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr

Read more:

Law firms in Meta antitrust lawsuit clash over lead role

Quinn Emanuel's Chicago leader to depart for state judgeship

U.S. judge warns law firms in Clearview AI lawsuit over 'disarray'

Lawyer David Boies bills $1,950 hourly in Google case, court filing shows

(Reporting by Mike Scarcella; editing by Leigh Jones)

Subscribe now to our Premium Plan for an ad-free and unlimited reading experience!


Next In Tech News

Microsoft searching for solutions over UK block on Activision deal -president
Google's AI to power virtual travel agent from Priceline
Crypto exchange Binance hit by outflows of $780 million in last 24 hours - Nansen
Kraken says systems operational after issue with crypto gateways
Apple adds journaling app, StandBy mode to iPhone software
‘Get yourself drunk to give him a chance’: Restaurant poster reignites furious online debate over extent of casual sexism in China
‘Poverty limits my imagination’: ‘Show-off’ groom uses armoured car to deliver RM6.45mil in cash and gold bars as betrothal gift
Opinion: Would you let Elon Musk implant a device in your brain?
How to find out if your data is circulating on the Dark Web
Hacking spree feared after breach of file-sharing software

Others Also Read