Uber, Lyft drivers sue to overturn California ballot measure

A ride share car displays Lyft and Uber stickers on its front windshield in downtown Los Angeles. Drivers for app-based ride-hailing and delivery services are suing to overturn a California ballot initiative that makes them independent contractors instead of employees eligible for benefits and job protections. — AP

Ride-hail and delivery drivers are suing to invalidate the California ballot measure approved in November that declared them independent contractors, the latest volley in the state’s years-long struggle over whether gig workers are employees.

The Service Employees International Union and a group of drivers for Uber Technologies Inc, Lyft Inc, DoorDash Inc and Instacart Inc filed a petition Tuesday in the California Supreme Court claiming that Proposition 22, the measure the gig companies spent US$200mil (RM808.60mil) to place on the ballot and get approved by voters, violates the state’s constitution.

The measure designates app-based drivers as contractors under state law – rather than employees entitled to protections like sick pay and worker’s compensation – though it provides for some alternative benefits. It also prohibits the legislature from making amendments without at least seven-eighths support, including by passing laws letting unions negotiate on behalf of drivers.

The drivers argue that Proposition 22 unconstitutionally usurps the legislature’s authority over worker’s compensation, as well as the judiciary’s authority to dictate what counts as an “amendment” to a ballot measure. They also claim that the measure violates the constitutional requirement that each measure be limited to a single subject.

“If allowed to stand, the ploy will be repeated in other initiatives as an effective means to slip potentially unpopular provisions past the voters,” according to the complaint.

The companies have said drivers prefer contractor status. In an emailed statement on behalf of the industry-backed campaign for Prop. 22, Uber driver Jim Pyatt said: “Meritless lawsuits that seek to undermine the clear democratic will of the people do not stand up to scrutiny in the courts.” – Bloomberg

Article type: metered
User Type: anonymous web
User Status:
Campaign ID: 18
Cxense type: free
User access status: 3

Did you find this article insightful?


Next In Tech News

McDonald's will test plant-based food, following Beyond Meat partnership
Pokemon's appeal continues to endure, even during the pandemic
That cheap 2TB USB stick is probably fake - here’s how you know
In ‘Dadish 2’ you’re a radish dad looking for your lost babies
Outgrowing your smartphone camera? Consider a system camera
Used electric car batteries are heading to factories and farms
Sony to open PlayStation 5 for storage upgrades in summer
Samsung Galaxy Buds Pro: All set to make waves
The school leader getting New Mexico’s tribes online
Sharing ‘deepfake’ porn images should be a crime, says British law body

Stories You'll Enjoy