Opinion: We really weren’t ready to work from home

Executives are realising that work-from-home means more than just email and videoconferencing. — Tumisu/Pixabay

Call it teething problems, disorganisation or plain Luddism: the first few weeks of working from home were, for many, far from smooth.

Set aside for a second the impact of hunkering down with children, paramours and housemates. The coronavirus lockdowns revealed a deep division even between white-collar workers: those employed by companies that have invested in what it takes for employees to switch truly seamlessly between the office and working from home, and those employed by companies that haven’t. Many people discovered it was a myth they could do their job just as easily from the dining room table. What might be de rigueur in Silicon Valley is far from normal elsewhere.

Among firms with more than US$1bil (RM4.36bil) of revenue, a surprisingly small portion – perhaps 10% – is used to having much of its workforce regularly work remotely, Gartner Inc analyst Brian Kropp estimates. Another 40% has established work-from-home practices, but didn’t necessarily have the adequate infrastructure for the current crisis. The remaining 50% was unprepared and has been scrambling to catch up with panic buying of services and hardware.

That unpreparedness might help explain the whipsawing attitudes toward those facilitating remote work, not least Zoom Video Communications Inc, the voguish web-conferencing provider. At first, there was the upswing. Zoom saw the number of simultaneous users jump from 10 million at the start of the year, to some 200 million by April 1 and 300 million on April 21. Then the backlash, as a series of companies warned their employees against using Zoom’s services.

Daimler AG, the parent of luxury carmaker Mercedes-Benz, cited the software’s "various security gaps” in a memo reported by Bloomberg News, pointing its staff instead towards Microsoft Inc.’s Teams collaboration platform. Yet a slew of such moves probably has as much to do with companies’ preparedness for remote working as it does with any deficiencies on Zoom’s side: Employees seemed simply not to know what they were supposed to be using.

Early in the lockdown, it seemed feasible to let employees use a range of different products if it was to be a temporary arrangement. As the restrictive measures last longer, firms are having to choose between technologies. Microsoft Teams, for instance, can cost as much as US$35 (RM152) monthly per user. Scale that to tens or hundreds of thousands of employees, and it becomes a major cost. You probably don’t want to be paying for several duplicate services at once.

Slack Technologies Inc’s experience highlights the unreadiness: It enjoyed a surge not just in total users (which includes employees at existing corporate customers), but also in new customers – firms that didn’t previously use its tools.

Executives are realising that work-from-home means more than just email and videoconferencing. That’s creating an opportunity for firms like Citrix Systems Inc and Teamviewer AG, which provide so-called virtual private networks letting employees access corporate systems remotely. They allow you to log onto your work computer from your home laptop, route customer service calls to workers’ private telephone numbers or run complex applications – all while keeping the data off the public Internet. Fort Lauderdale, Florida-based Citrix enjoyed a 20% sales jump to US$861mil (RM3.75bil) in the first quarter. Investors might otherwise have expected an increase of less than 5%, according to Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Mandeep Singh.

Citrix Chief Executive Officer David Henshall said on April 23 that he expects his company to keep benefiting from customers’ realisation that their businesses depend on hundreds and hundreds of applications that need to run on powerful networks if the bulk of employees aren’t in the office.

While he warned that doesn’t mean Citrix will be immune to the economic downturn, it’s going to be harder to put the work-from-home trend back in the bottle when people can go back to the office. Now that even companies wary about remote working are building out the necessary infrastructure, employees might as well use it.

The virus has highlighted a bunch of work-from-home defects. It’s also forcing them to be fixed.

This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.

Alex Webb is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Europe's technology, media and communications industries. He previously covered Apple and other technology companies for Bloomberg News in San Francisco. – Bloomberg

Article type: metered
User Type: anonymous web
User Status:
Campaign ID: 46
Cxense type: free
User access status: 3
Join our Telegram channel to get our Evening Alerts and breaking news highlights

Next In Tech News

WhatsApp multi-device feature limitations: What you may not be able to do
Study: Shoppers in Singapore tend to reuse log-in details, passwords
NTU scientists develop robots the size of a rice grain that may help in surgery in future
MCMC: Communications, Internet coverage around Kota Tinggi fully restored
Amazon opens its largest-yet cashierless grocery in US
Bitcoin drops as hashrate declines with China mining crackdown
Huge changes for Internet and Big Tech under US antitrust proposal
Will we use individual flying capsules for quick trips in tomorrow's cities?
End of road for controversial Snapchat ‘speed filter’
Carving a career in eSports

Stories You'll Enjoy