New Hampshire ban on 'ballot selfies' challenged by lawsuit


  • TECH
  • Monday, 03 Nov 2014

UNCONSTITUTIONAL?: The New Hampshire Civil Liberties Union is seeking to block a law prohibiting the sharing of images of marked election ballots over social media.

MANCHESTER, New Hampshire: A New Hampshire law that bans the sharing of images of marked election ballots over social media compromises the right of free political speech in the state, according to a lawsuit filed challenging the prohibition on "ballot selfies." 

The New Hampshire Civil Liberties Union is seeking to block the law, which took effect on Sept 1, prohibiting sharing such images over Twitter, Facebook or any other online or conventional means. 

Two of the plaintiffs are being investigated by the Office of the New Hampshire Secretary of State for violating the law during the Sept 9 primary election, according to the lawsuit, which was filed in federal district court in Concord. 

One of the plaintiffs, Andrew Langlois, posted a picture on Facebook that showed he wrote in "Akira," the name of his dog, as his Republican choice for U.S. Senate. 

"Mr Langlois' vote and the publication of his ballot on social media were acts of protest against his choices for Senate — each of whom he disapproved," the NHCLU said in a statement announcing the lawsuit. 

"Political speech is essential to a functioning democracy," said NHCLU staff attorney Gilles Bissonnette. 

"The First Amendment does not allow the state to, as it is doing here, broadly ban innocent political speech with the hope that such a sweeping ban will address underlying criminal conduct." 

Violating the law is punishable by up to a US$1,000 (RM3,305) fine. 

The lawsuit, which names New Hampshire Secretary of State William Gardner as the defendant, seeks an injunction on the law, although the NHCLU said it does not expect the law to be blocked before national and state elections on Nov 4. 

Gardner did not return a call for comment on Friday. 

The "ballot selfie" law, as it has become popularly known, was meant to update a century-old law against vote rigging. In the late 1800s, vote buying was widespread and showing a marked ballot was a way to redeem compensation, often in the form of cash or liquor. 

Similar laws against displaying marked ballots are on the books in several other states. 

The New Hampshire law is aimed at bringing the restriction up to date in an era when many people have smartphone cameras and want to share experiences instantly through social media. 

European authorities have also discouraged "selfies" at polling places out of concern they may violate ballot secrecy regulations. — Reuters

Article type: metered
User Type: anonymous web
User Status:
Campaign ID: 1
Cxense type: free
User access status: 3
   

Did you find this article insightful?

Yes
No

Next In Tech News

Polish e-commerce group Allegro to pilot own parcel lockers
Jeff Bezos called upon to save thousands of stranded seafarers
China’s ‘wild era’ of Internet may be ending as new personal data protection law seeks to curb Big Tech’s control over user data
Can you beat a virtual Beth Harmon from ‘The Queen’s Gambit’ in a game of chess?
Madonna is trending on Twitter after fans mistakenly thought she died instead of Maradona
Scammers targeting i-Sinar applicants with fake mobile apps
Mexico moves to stem unauthorised sharing of sexual images online
South Korean chat room operator gets 40 years for ‘sextortion’, blackmail
WeRide robotaxis gain loyal passengers but fixed pick-up, drop-off spots irk some, survey shows
A different ‘super spreader’: Facebook struggles with election disinfo

Stories You'll Enjoy