Grok controversy a case study in product liability


THE decision by the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) to block access to the AI chatbot Grok is a decisive, albeit reactive, measure. This action, taken to prevent content that creates liability under Malaysian laws, including Section 233 of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998, serves as a necessary firebreak against the unchecked proliferation of non-consensual, sexually explicit deepfakes.

But it also underscores the timeliness of the Online Safety Act 2025 (ONSA), which came into force on Jan 1. ONSA fundamentally reshapes the liability landscape by designating social media platforms as Licensed Service Providers.

Play, subscribe and stand a chance to win prizes worth over RM39,000! T&C applies.

Monthly Plan

RM 13.90/month

RM 11.12/month

Billed as RM 11.12 for the 1st month, RM 13.90 thereafter.

Best Value

Annual Plan

RM 12.33/month

RM 9.87/month

Billed as RM 118.40 for the 1st year, RM 148 thereafter.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
AI , safety concerns

Next In Letters

Future value of education�
Reforms reap results in deterring economic crime
Censors, please don’t spoil the movie�
Strengthening domestic economy in times of crisis�
Malaysia needs to reform its fiscal foundation
What we owe Amirul and his family
Let’s all embrace duty of care to keep our roads safe
When ‘candy’ has hidden dangers for children
Punishment must be tied to intent and circumstances�
New blueprint for China-Malaysia collaborations ��

Others Also Read