Grok controversy a case study in product liability


THE decision by the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) to block access to the AI chatbot Grok is a decisive, albeit reactive, measure. This action, taken to prevent content that creates liability under Malaysian laws, including Section 233 of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998, serves as a necessary firebreak against the unchecked proliferation of non-consensual, sexually explicit deepfakes.

But it also underscores the timeliness of the Online Safety Act 2025 (ONSA), which came into force on Jan 1. ONSA fundamentally reshapes the liability landscape by designating social media platforms as Licensed Service Providers.

Save 30% OFF The Star Digital Access

Monthly Plan

RM 13.90/month

RM 9.73/month

Billed as RM 9.73 for the 1st month, RM 13.90 thereafter.

Best Value

Annual Plan

RM 12.33/month

RM 8.63/month

Billed as RM 103.60 for the 1st year, RM 148 thereafter.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
AI , safety concerns

Next In Letters

Why Malaysia needs a guided standard in education
Safety leadership a moral imperative
Safety training programme warrants closer scrutiny
Call for full declassification of concession agreements
Amended Act ensures fairness in arbitration law �
China's 15th five-year plan, sustainable development goals and cooperation with Malaysia
Labour issues must be resolved to stem brain drain�
Tackling bias in automated decision-making systems�
On-the-ground reality of childcare fee tax relief
Tun Razak's legacy 50 years on: From commemoration to cultivation for Malaysia's future

Others Also Read