Grok controversy a case study in product liability


THE decision by the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) to block access to the AI chatbot Grok is a decisive, albeit reactive, measure. This action, taken to prevent content that creates liability under Malaysian laws, including Section 233 of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998, serves as a necessary firebreak against the unchecked proliferation of non-consensual, sexually explicit deepfakes.

But it also underscores the timeliness of the Online Safety Act 2025 (ONSA), which came into force on Jan 1. ONSA fundamentally reshapes the liability landscape by designating social media platforms as Licensed Service Providers.

The Star Festive Promo: Get 35% OFF Digital Access

Monthly Plan

RM 13.90/month

Best Value

Annual Plan

RM 12.33/month

RM 8.02/month

Billed as RM 96.20 for the 1st year, RM 148 thereafter.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
AI , safety concerns

Next In Letters

Use policy to drive healthier lifestyles
Uphold mutual respect for places of worship�
Beware the privacy cost of viral AI trends
Playing safe in hot weather
Revisit 2013 consensus on recognising the UEC
A rational perspective on land trespassing
Stop using public power to pressure media, MACC chief must submit to independent probe
Credit charge a surprise for customer� �
Solving Klang Valley’s transport congestion��
Use community-led approach to�tackle stunting

Others Also Read