Grok controversy a case study in product liability


THE decision by the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) to block access to the AI chatbot Grok is a decisive, albeit reactive, measure. This action, taken to prevent content that creates liability under Malaysian laws, including Section 233 of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998, serves as a necessary firebreak against the unchecked proliferation of non-consensual, sexually explicit deepfakes.

But it also underscores the timeliness of the Online Safety Act 2025 (ONSA), which came into force on Jan 1. ONSA fundamentally reshapes the liability landscape by designating social media platforms as Licensed Service Providers.

Get 20% OFF The Star Digital Access

Monthly Plan

RM 13.90/month

RM 11.12/month

Billed as RM 11.12 for the 1st month, RM 13.90 thereafter.

Best Value

Annual Plan

RM 12.33/month

RM 9.87/month

Billed as RM 118.40 for the 1st year, RM 148 thereafter.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
AI , safety concerns

Next In Letters

A heart-protective shot in the arm
We borrow the Earth from our children
Not every outbreak is the next Covid-19
Start a national movement connecting M’sia and the Antarctic
'Yet to be enforced' claims a hollow excuse, Ng Sze Han must explain restrictive guidelines
A balanced approach to senior citizen driving
Paying taxes is a promise to keep the nation alive for all of us
Whither our digital etiquette?
Why a marginal RON95 hike makes more sense than costly diesel
Corruption begins long before the first bribe

Others Also Read