Biofuel, a good green option


Photo: Filepic/The Star

MALAYSIA’S New Energy Transition Roadmap has identified biomass as a source of energy for the country. Biomass includes waste from agriculture as well as dedicated biomass crops. But it is specifically oil palm biomass, mainly the empty fruit bunches (EFBs), that is attracting much investor interest. Every year, about 20 million tonnes are available.

The National Biomass Action Plan provides a roadmap to developing this new biomass business. However, not everyone is comfortable with the meteoric rise of the palm oil industry. We now hear of another attempt to undermine it: A recent British news report says burning EFBs can lead to higher carbon emissions (“Viability of biomass energy in green race”, The Star, Aug 17; online at bit.ly/star_biomass). This is another nonsensical claim lacking in science. The fact is, for a palm oil-producing country like Malaysia, biomass is a much better option than even solar energy since the import element is almost zero. It is more inclusive economically because the ultimate value would trickle down to oil palm smallholders.

Save 30% OFF The Star Digital Access

Monthly Plan

RM 13.90/month

RM 9.73/month

Billed as RM 9.73 for the 1st month, RM 13.90 thereafter.

Best Value

Annual Plan

RM 12.33/month

RM 8.63/month

Billed as RM 103.60 for the 1st year, RM 148 thereafter.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Next In Letters

Safety training programme warrants closer scrutiny
Call for full declassification of concession agreements
Amended Act ensures fairness in arbitration law �
China's 15th five-year plan, sustainable development goals and cooperation with Malaysia
Labour issues must be resolved to stem brain drain�
Tackling bias in automated decision-making systems�
On-the-ground reality of childcare fee tax relief
Tun Razak's legacy 50 years on: From commemoration to cultivation for Malaysia's future
Avoid treating chatbots as confidants or medical advisers
Broad protections for free speech have real costs�

Others Also Read