Exercising the power of inherent jurisdiction


IN the case of Karpal Singh & Anor v Public Prosecutor (1991), the following question of law was referred to the then Supreme Court for its consideration: “Whether the court has a general inherent power to protect its process from abuse to safeguard an accused person from oppressing or prejudice by striking out frivolous proceedings.”

The then Supreme Court held that by virtue of Section 173 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CPC), the subordinate courts had no power to strike out proceedings or acquit an accused person without hearing evidence for the prosecution.

The Star Christmas Special Promo: Save 35% OFF Yearly. T&C applies.

Monthly Plan

RM 13.90/month

Best Value

Annual Plan

RM 12.33/month

RM 8.02/month

Billed as RM 96.20 for the 1st year, RM 148 thereafter.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Next In Letters

Why 2026 will test our ability to think for ourselves
Gaza’s children never signed up for lives full of trauma
The year we forgot to ask
Penang State Structure Plan 2040: Procedural fairness lacking in ‘public consultations’ must be rectified
The generation gap in mental health
Public health must not be traded for short-term profits
A free press is not a luxury, but a necessity
Growing debt trap for Malaysia’s youth
Beyond the verdict: Justice, civility and the dignity of the nation we choose to be
'Dr' title no trivial matter: MMC must uphold professional standards

Others Also Read