Beyond the sweetness


WE refer to the thought-provoking article “WHO cancer arm deems aspartame ‘possible carcinogen’; consumption limits unchanged” (The Star, July 14; online at bit.ly/aspartamewho), which emphasised our shared concern over the health implications of the use of non-nutritive sweeteners such as aspartame and sucralose in Malaysia.

This development brings into question the public’s acceptance of the Malaysian sugar tax intended to encourage the consumption of lower sucrose beverages. Ironically, the tax inadvertently motivates food manufacturers to use non-nutritive sweeteners as a compensatory measure for the sweetness deficit resulting from reduced sucrose.

Get 20% OFF The Star Digital Access

Monthly Plan

RM 13.90/month

RM 11.12/month

Billed as RM 11.12 for the 1st month, RM 13.90 thereafter.

Best Value

Annual Plan

RM 12.33/month

RM 9.87/month

Billed as RM 118.40 for the 1st year, RM 148 thereafter.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
Food; sugar alternatives

Next In Letters

A possible pathway for resolving human-elephant conflict in Johor
Scams – focusing on laws and technology is not enough
The Iran conflict and Covid-19: A tale of two shocks
RON95 subsidy reform must reflect real-life pressures faced by ordinary families
When intellectual silence becomes a national risk
Where's the campaign for the elephants in Malaysia?
Malaysia, we need to talk about femicide
Can we do more about these types of bad road users?
Women empowerment: Easier said than done
When politicians become content creators

Others Also Read