Beyond the sweetness


WE refer to the thought-provoking article “WHO cancer arm deems aspartame ‘possible carcinogen’; consumption limits unchanged” (The Star, July 14; online at bit.ly/aspartamewho), which emphasised our shared concern over the health implications of the use of non-nutritive sweeteners such as aspartame and sucralose in Malaysia.

This development brings into question the public’s acceptance of the Malaysian sugar tax intended to encourage the consumption of lower sucrose beverages. Ironically, the tax inadvertently motivates food manufacturers to use non-nutritive sweeteners as a compensatory measure for the sweetness deficit resulting from reduced sucrose.

The Star Christmas Special Promo: Save 35% OFF Yearly. T&C applies.

Monthly Plan

RM 13.90/month

Best Value

Annual Plan

RM 12.33/month

RM 8.02/month

Billed as RM 96.20 for the 1st year, RM 148 thereafter.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
Food; sugar alternatives

Next In Letters

Penang State Structure Plan 2040: Procedural fairness lacking in ‘public consultations’ must be rectified
The generation gap in mental health
Growing debt trap for Malaysia’s youth
Public health must not be traded for short-term profits
A free press is not a luxury, but a necessity
Beyond the verdict: Justice, civility and the dignity of the nation we choose to be
'Dr' title no trivial matter: MMC must uphold professional standards
Older – but also wiser, kinder and more hopeful in 2026
Isn’t healthcare a basic right of every Malaysian?
Difficult SPM paper needs careful assessment before marking

Others Also Read