Beyond the sweetness


WE refer to the thought-provoking article “WHO cancer arm deems aspartame ‘possible carcinogen’; consumption limits unchanged” (The Star, July 14; online at bit.ly/aspartamewho), which emphasised our shared concern over the health implications of the use of non-nutritive sweeteners such as aspartame and sucralose in Malaysia.

This development brings into question the public’s acceptance of the Malaysian sugar tax intended to encourage the consumption of lower sucrose beverages. Ironically, the tax inadvertently motivates food manufacturers to use non-nutritive sweeteners as a compensatory measure for the sweetness deficit resulting from reduced sucrose.

Save 30% OFF The Star Digital Access

Monthly Plan

RM 13.90/month

RM 9.73/month

Billed as RM 9.73 for the 1st month, RM 13.90 thereafter.

Best Value

Annual Plan

RM 12.33/month

RM 8.63/month

Billed as RM 103.60 for the 1st year, RM 148 thereafter.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
Food; sugar alternatives

Next In Letters

Why Malaysia needs a guided standard in education
Safety leadership a moral imperative
Grok controversy a case study in product liability
Safety training programme warrants closer scrutiny
Call for full declassification of concession agreements
Amended Act ensures fairness in arbitration law �
China's 15th five-year plan, sustainable development goals and cooperation with Malaysia
Labour issues must be resolved to stem brain drain�
Tackling bias in automated decision-making systems�
On-the-ground reality of childcare fee tax relief

Others Also Read