Fraud and arbitrability: A critical view of the Sulu case


FRAUD and the issue of arbitrability was an ongoing debate even before the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (NYC 1958) was adopted at the United Nations in 1958. This debate has not abated even in countries that have also adopted UNCITRAL (United Nations Commission on International Trade Law) Model Law 1985 wholly or partly to support NYC 1958.

One of the main short comings of NYC 1958 is that it can promote the issuance of fraudulent awards without the participation of the victim – ie respondent to the award – which are not within the prescribed terms of the convention and get them enforced through the courts by an ex-parte order if the enforcement court is not vigilant.

Win a prize this Mother's Day by subscribing to our annual plan now! T&C applies.

Monthly Plan

RM13.90/month

Annual Plan

RM12.33/month

Billed as RM148.00/year

1 month

Free Trial

For new subscribers only


Cancel anytime. No ads. Auto-renewal. Unlimited access to the web and app. Personalised features. Members rewards.
Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Sulu case , arbitration , legal system , fraud ,

   

Next In Letters

Stand in solidarity with police to fight terrorism
Hostile groups are a threat to the nation’s social fabric
Acting out violent ideologies
Urgent measures needed
‘Learn to say thank you, please’
Women in the workforce
Do more to promote Pulau Ketam to seniors
Curb children’s social media usage
Women leading the way to safer maritime workplaces
Separate events for better support for women shuttlers

Others Also Read