Fraud and arbitrability: A critical view of the Sulu case


FRAUD and the issue of arbitrability was an ongoing debate even before the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (NYC 1958) was adopted at the United Nations in 1958. This debate has not abated even in countries that have also adopted UNCITRAL (United Nations Commission on International Trade Law) Model Law 1985 wholly or partly to support NYC 1958.

One of the main short comings of NYC 1958 is that it can promote the issuance of fraudulent awards without the participation of the victim – ie respondent to the award – which are not within the prescribed terms of the convention and get them enforced through the courts by an ex-parte order if the enforcement court is not vigilant.

Get 20% OFF The Star Digital Access

Monthly Plan

RM 13.90/month

RM 11.12/month

Billed as RM 11.12 for the 1st month, RM 13.90 thereafter.

Best Value

Annual Plan

RM 12.33/month

RM 9.87/month

Billed as RM 118.40 for the 1st year, RM 148 thereafter.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
Sulu case , arbitration , legal system , fraud ,

Next In Letters

No one should be above road safety laws�
Gaining true social and economic independence an ongoing project�
Small price to pay monthly for 24-hour protection�
When money moves faster than judgement
Why more roads are only part of the solution to traffic congestion
What MRI scans reveal about methamphetamine addiction and the road to recovery
Repealing the Auku: What it means for Malaysian higher education
Ensuring our brains keep up as we age
Cultural, social biases that cause harm
What makes Malaysia truly Malaysia?

Others Also Read