Justice not served in sexual harassment case


I READ with utter dismay the report “‘DPP decided against sexual harassment prosecution’” (The Star, Aug 31; online at https://bit.ly/34PJOKH), which quoted Brickfields OCPD Asst Comm Zailrulnizam Mohd Zainuddin@Hilmi saying the DPP (deputy public prosecutor) made the decision after considering that the public university where the offence took place had taken action against the suspect.

This reasoning is astounding considering the fact that the suspect was investigated under Section 354 of the Penal Code for outrage of modesty.

The Star Christmas Special Promo: Save 35% OFF Yearly. T&C applies.

Monthly Plan

RM 13.90/month

Best Value

Annual Plan

RM 12.33/month

RM 8.02/month

Billed as RM 96.20 for the 1st year, RM 148 thereafter.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Next In Letters

Group lauds govt’s anti-vehicle overloading policy
Innovative model for cheaper energy supply��
Prepare plan of action to keep animals safe during floods�
Progress begins with the courage to experiment
Malaysia-US 'reciprocal' trade deal merits urgent, careful reconsideration
Malaysia’s older population needs focused attention
SST ‘tax on tax’ needs urgent review
Connection, empathy, respect are key
A doctor's pledge: Reaching out to every child in Malaysia
Newly introduced SST ‘tax on tax’ needs urgent review

Others Also Read