An anti-viral economic booster

  • Letters
  • Wednesday, 19 Feb 2020

The outbreak of the Covid-19 coronavirus sent shockwaves around the world as nations hastily assembled together stimulus packages in the wake of this unforeseen event. The Institute of Strategic Analysis and Policy Research (INSAP) are greatly concerned about this and are monitoring the situation closely. In this regard, I have penned considerations for the upcoming stimulus package to be announced soon, which Dr Ahmed Razman Abdul Latiff of Putra Business School expects could total up to RM15bil.

The stimulus should be prudent and its scope limited to affected industries, taking precaution not to spend excessively. An overpowering stimulus package has the potential to reduce long-run productivity as public spending crowds out private investment, whereas spending too quickly may cause the stimulus to prematurely run out of steam. Therefore, a boost to infrastructure spending on roads and railways by way of a traditional stimulus package may not necessarily achieve its intended results.

Most importantly, the global community is completely in the dark about where we are in the current crisis. Therefore, based on my view, the stimulus package should be released in stages or tranches, rolled out through several “mini packages” sustained over a period of time to manage the outflow of public money to targeted industries, just as a sick patient is advised not to consume all their medicine in one go but in regularly timed intervals.

It is well known that the first casualties of the outbreak would be the aviation, tourism, and retail sectors, with Chinese tourists making up around RM12.2bil or 14.5% of total foreign spending receipts in 2018. The Malaysian Association of Hotels having recently revealed that cancelled bookings had thus far resulted in RM40mil in lost revenue. Likewise, the banking sector would be badly affected as businesses struggle to repay loan commitments in the short term. Therefore, a good stimulus policy should carefully consider the needs of such stakeholders.

INSAP views that the aim of the stimulus policy should in effect, be double-pronged, firstly to reduce cashflow requirements and secondly to boost consumer spending power. Ultimately, as revenue for the tourism and retail sectors are largely seasonal, their day-to-day cash requirements should be of paramount importance. A policy of encouraging banks to provide soft working capital loans through partial government guarantees for affected industries and SME’s will help to ensure worker’s salaries and supply orders are timely and adequately met.

To reduce the burden on working capital, a policy of short-term discounts on utility bills, Human Resources Development Fund (HRDF) government tax levy exemption and a moratorium on hotel levies and import duties on televisions and video equipment similar to the 2003 package may prove effective for the tourism sector, particularly for hotels and casinos. The stimulus should likewise consider a short-term rebate for monthly rental expenses which often make up the largest cost burden for retailers.

To boost consumer spending, the government may further continue the e-Tunai cash injection scheme sustained over a timed interval basis. This is similar to past cash injection programs but with a key difference of forcing consumers to spend within a defined time frame and spurs increased adoption of e-Wallet technology amongst retailers. Despite this, many retailers in Malaysia suffer from a slow cashless technology adoption rate due to the additional costs involved. Therefore, it may be necessary to provide a portion of the cash injection through the traditional banking sector. A short-term moratorium on Sales and Services Tax (SST) charges for affected industries should likewise be implemented to allow for greater competition as retailers slash prices to raise sales, boosting consumer spending. As well as distributing bonuses to civil servants with an option for reducing employee’s contribution to Employees Provident Fund (EPF) from 11% to 9% for the year 2020, similar to the 2003 package. Greater disposable income will thus act as a strong short-term stimulus for overall GDP growth.

A similar policy was introduced in Australia in 2009 where 8 million Australians received a cash bonus of AU$900 (RM2,508). The effect of the cash injection was profoundly beneficial for retailers and the stock market rebounded. However, a considerable portion was instead spent on holidays abroad, dampening its intended effect on the local economy. Therefore, the stimulus should encourage spending in the local domestic tourism industry through the zero-rating of all domestic departure charges and levies and through government social media promotion and large promotional events.

Although the industries aforementioned are among the greatest concern, Malaysian exporters are likewise particularly vulnerable, especially those in the electronics and electricals (E&E) sector, where exporters are unable to reach their supply chains in China. As a result, it may be necessary to establish an emergency warehousing system and to hold regular discussions with companies along the affected supply chain to resolve issues quickly in the short-term and avoiding a spike in manufacturing unemployment. However, it may not be possible to avoid a certain degree of job losses, as companies downscale production in the short-term, therefore a reskilling and retraining government rebate programme should be widely implemented where vocational and educational institutions are compensated for providing reskilling programmes to recently unemployed workers.

It should be noted here that the 2003 SARS epidemic caused an estimated US$40bil (RM166.4bil) in losses to the global economy, however China today is 4.5 times larger than 2003 and the current impact is estimated to be much more wide-reaching and to cost more in damage to the global supply chain.

To conclude, though there are a myriad of policy tools at the government’s disposal, the success of the stimulus package depends on the prudence and ability of the government to implement policies thoughtfully and sensibly in stages, providing immediate relief to the business community and creating an effective ecosystem where the economic concerns of all sectors and stakeholders affected are effectively and adequately addressed.

Qarrem Kassim , Economist , Institute of Strategic Analysis and Policy Research

Article type: metered
User Type: anonymous web
User Status:
Campaign ID: 18
Cxense type: free
User access status: 3

Did you find this article insightful?


100% readers found this article insightful

Across the site