THE bombs were raining down on the Al-Asad airbase in Iraq few days ago, evoking epochal memories across the ages.
TV reporters said it reminded them of the light show in Baghdad on March 20,2003. Political analysts opined it could begin another endless military adventure such as Afghanistan. There were even suggestion of the likelihood of regional contagion, drawing parallels with Archduke Ferdinand's assassination in 1914, which triggered World War One.
For me, though, it brought to mind popular anthems of the Vietnam War era, when the average Joe was called upon to suffer the hardships of an exotic war in foreign lands, while the rich elite cooled their heels in comfort back home. As the lyrics of Creedence Clearwater Revival's Fortunate Son go; "it ain't me, I ain't no senator's son. It ain't me, I ain't no fortunate one".
However, that is exactly what US president Donald Trump is – a silver-spooned hustler whose bark is so loud and incessant that no one ever hangs around long enough for the bite – which often enough never comes. In his typical fashion, Trump acted impetuously by assassinating Iranian military commander Major General Qasem Soleimani, following it with more bluster and hyperbole about the consequences of any response from Iran.
Trump's strategy in doing so was highlighted in archival footage when he accused former US President Barack Obama of trying to start a war with Iran as a last-ditch desperate attempt to secure his second-term re-election in 2012. The script fit perfectly with his current predicament, having just lost his impeachment vote in Congress last month.
Whether Trump really wants a all-out war with Iran that would undoubtedly draw in other players across trench lines, or simply to rattle the cage loud enough so that it drowns out noise of his other misdemeanors back home – is still unclear. Both scenarios are almost equally disastrous.
If this is meant to be pre-election posturing, then he is playing with fire, not to mention lives. When Trump "sets the dial to 11", sooner of later he will blow the fuse.
So far, in his three years in office, this is the closest he has come to doing so – which is really saying something given his multiple misadventures with Mexico Ukraine, North Korea, Nato, etc.
There is some evidence that Trump will back down and show some uncharacteristic restraint, as he did when he recalled the jets after Iran (allegedly) shot down a US drone. In this case, Iran carefully telegraphed that it would make a one-off,"proportional" response to the killing of Sulaimani, and then used discretion in targeting their attack on a section of a base that was devoid of American troops.
The Iranians underlined their action with explicit threats to use their proxies to target Israel and other US assets in the region in order to contain an American response; and America's Nato allies were also quick to reinforce this message by warning against further military escalation – from either side.
The other scenario is that the hard-right, neo-conservative camp in Trump's party has finally got their long-sought "prize" of an all-out regime change war in Iran. Amongst calls for restraint, there are identifiable yelps of delight from the likes of John Bolton, Lindsey Graham, and, of course, Fox News.
Israel's Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu, himself the subject of criminal corruption charges at home, was the most vocal cheerleader for the actions that have brought the two nations to the brink of war.
Even Saudi Arabia and the UAE have been roped in to support the American military agenda, which targets Iran, yes – but also trains the crosshairs upon Russia and China, who will necessarily be drawn into any regional near-East conflict.
Worse, any open conflict may serve as a convenient excuse for other simmering disputes to boil over, such as India and Pakistan, North and South Korea, China and Taiwan. That sounds a lot more ominous than a pre-election ruse, so let's hope – this time – that Trump is only looking out for Trump.
What do you think of this article?