Striving for balance in freedom of expression

  • Letters
  • Tuesday, 27 Aug 2019

THE report that “Mujahid hopes to have law on hate speech this year” (The Star, Aug 26) would indeed be welcomed by the vast majority of moderate Malaysians.

Our maturing democracy, as shown by last year’s peaceful transition to a new government, can be further enhanced when we take freedom of speech seriously and intelligently.

Generally, laws on hate speech are aimed at those who incite hatred, unrest, violence and harm against others.

In our thriving multi-ethnic society, people intending to cause harm should not be allowed to hide behind the free speech banner.

Arguably, the 70-year-old Sedition Act needs to replaced with a new law that can provide a better balance between protecting freedom of speech with the need to safeguard our nation from malicious or hateful rhetoric.

Perhaps something like a new National Harmony Act can be enacted to strive for this acceptable balance.

Stakeholders including the Attorney General, experts on human rights, lawyers, academics and non-governmental bodies must be closely consulted to deal with this key issue of balancing hate speech with freedom of speech and expression.

We need to heed the wise warning that “freedom of expression without limits is like a car without brakes”.



Article type: metered
User Type: anonymous web
User Status:
Campaign ID: 7
Cxense type: free
User access status: 3

peace , harmony


What do you think of this article?

It is insightful
Not in my interest

Across The Star Online