Benefits do not justify cost of construction


  • Letters
  • Thursday, 25 Apr 2019

THE environmental impact assessment (EIA) report on the Pan Island Link 1 (PIL 1) states that the multibillion ringgit “super highway” passing through tunnels cut in hills and across recreational and residential areas will reach maximum carrying capacity within four years of completion.

Considering that PIL 1 would be “good” only for such a short time, the EIA squarely nails the government’s claim of it being able to “dramatically reduce travelling time” from the north of the island to the airport as a lie. This is because spending about RM7bil for such a short-term “benefit” is not sensible economically, let alone a lasting solution to Penang’s traffic congestion problem. In fact, it will create more private vehicle traffic and further congestion on the island. So why is the government hell-bent on ramming this project through?

Limited time offer:
Just RM5 per month.

Monthly Plan

RM13.90/month
RM5/month

Billed as RM5/month for the 1st 6 months then RM13.90 thereafters.

Annual Plan

RM12.33/month

Billed as RM148.00/year

1 month

Free Trial

For new subscribers only


Cancel anytime. No ads. Auto-renewal. Unlimited access to the web and app. Personalised features. Members rewards.
Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
   

Next In Letters

Gilley's remarks disrespect Malaysia's stance on Israel-Palestine conflict, says MCA Youth leader
Should we blame it all on plastic?
Cultivating good mental health starts from young
Working on safeguarding cross-border data transfer
There are economic benefits from waste
Climate’s effects on work
Small initiatives can help solve manpower problems
Removing fuel subsidy a discriminatory act
Call for open court proceedings not misplaced
Awaiting Labour Day with high expectations

Others Also Read