Spectre of UPSR results looms for SPM

  • Letters
  • Wednesday, 23 Nov 2016

IT was not just parents and their 12-year-old children who were devastated when the Ujian Pencapaian Sekolah Rendah (UPSR) results were released, but their teachers too. School halls and courtyards were described as eerie morgues and zombie-like funeral homes as the results were announced last Thursday. It was as if a national disaster had struck the country and immediate help was not forthcoming. Parents, students and teachers felt cheated as result slips failed completely to reflect the immense effort put in the whole year and more.

Parents were frantic. Teachers were up in arms over the unexpected outcome. Students cried uncontrollably.

The Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025 had written extensively on our country’s disastrous performance in Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) and Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). While our children would take home millions of As every year, globally we were unashamedly among the bottom third of the spectrum, even below Vietnam. We vowed that by 2025, we would be in the top third bracket among the participating countries but drastic steps had to be taken. This meant adopting more critical thinking and problem solving questions over time, the “how” and “why”, and which was subsequently given the name “higher order thinking skills” or HOTS.

The parents are aware of HOTS, realise and are grateful for UPSR to be aligned with TIMSS and PISA. This will gradually remove the dependence on memorisation and rote learning and eventually bode well at upper secondary and, especially, tertiary level. The teachers too see the long-term benefit and are conscientiously working hard towards that goal.

So what went wrong?

A black hole seems to exist in the process of transitioning from Kurikulum Baru Sekolah Rendah (KBSR) to Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Rendah (KSSR). This was the first cohort of KSSR which began in 2011 starting with Primary One. While this happens at every syllabus change, this time around it was abnormally chaotic. All parties realise that education is evolving and hard knocks are inevitable. But these knocks can be cushioned if the Education Ministry representing teachers and the Examination Syndicate had a better working relationship. Official detailed information should have been made clear and shared between each other in order that teachers were fully informed.

Grey areas existed and teachers were unsure of what was expected of them for knowledge to have been delivered with accuracy and students to have been prepped as best they could have been. Teachers felt that they were left in the dark and short-changed as instructions were a blur. They felt there was little co-operation among the respective departments that appeared to work in silos. It was only after the results were announced that teachers discovered what constitutes an A, B and etc., and whether a D or an E is a fail. It appears that it may have been a moving goal post after all.

The lesson to be learnt here and not to be repeated is that teachers need to know what is expected of them. In future, with a clear benchmark, marking and grading systems in mind, teachers will be able to inform parents who have to be made to understand how students can apply the knowledge gained and therefore obtain marks accordingly. “How” and “why” questions require thinking, which can be difficult but if done often and soon enough, the practice will benefit students in the long run.

On the bright side, it is a level playing field for all students concerned. Those who endeavour to proceed to residential, international or selected schools will continue to do so while the majority move on to their neighbourhood ones.

The greater worry that is around the corner is whether the Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia (SPM) examination results due in March 2017 will be a mirror image of the 2016 UPSR results.

The cohort that is in the midst of sitting for SPM is, after all, the same Pentaksiran Tingkatan 3 (PT3) students which saw a similar disastrous pattern two years ago.

More crucial is the fact that SPM is an extremely important assessment as the results will determine the students’ next course of action. This can take the form of a prestigious and life-changing overseas scholarship on one hand or failure to pursue tertiary education altogether on the other.


PAGE Chairman

Article type: metered
User Type: anonymous web
User Status:
Campaign ID: 1
Cxense type: free
User access status: 3

Next In Letters

Look out for Sirim label to be safe
There’s assistance for companies
Future for online learning
Find out what’s happening in class
Silent epidemic among urban poor
Some privileged people have a blind spot for the less fortunate
Let’s make ‘budi bahasa’ a way of life
How about automatic vaccination registration?
An inspirational memoir for young people
It is vital we increase vaccination registration numbers

Stories You'll Enjoy