Protecting both public health and development


Photo: Filepic/The Star

I AM writing in response to two articles about asbestos published in The Star: “Asbestos: The tiny fibres that threaten our lives” by Sim Leoi Leoi (April 16, online at bit.ly/star_asbestos) and “Useful, but dangerous: Asbestos needs to be phased out” by Dr Helmy Haja Mydin (Jan 30, online at bit.ly/star_phaseout).

The two articles advocate for a complete ban on all asbestos in Malaysia. However, a blanket ban overlooks Malaysia’s documented absence of significant asbestos-related disease incidence. We attribute this primarily to the established safety regime governing the use of the chrysotile form of asbestos over many decades, supported by Malaysia’s current regulatory framework, socioeconomic realities and broader international context, which collectively ensure its safe use in the country.

Get 20% OFF The Star Digital Access

Monthly Plan

RM 13.90/month

RM 11.12/month

Billed as RM 11.12 for the 1st month, RM 13.90 thereafter.

Best Value

Annual Plan

RM 12.33/month

RM 9.87/month

Billed as RM 118.40 for the 1st year, RM 148 thereafter.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
asbestos , safety , building , carcinogenic , development

Next In Letters

SMEs under pressure from rising diesel costs
Improve junior doctors’ welfare for a stronger healthcare system
Targeted assistance must reach those who really need it�
‘Selangor must prioritise forests over concrete’
Truth and falsehood in the age of AI�
Proactive strategy for building a resilient nation�
Insap: Workers deserve both higher wages and jobs to earn them, not policies that cost them both
Tribunal wins meaningless when awards are ignored
Broader issues affecting GP clinics
Effectiveness of public housing depends on clear rules and strict enforcement

Others Also Read