Russia vetoes extension of mission probing chemical weapons use in Syria


  • World
  • Tuesday, 24 Oct 2017

FILE PHOTO: A United Nations (U.N.) chemical weapons expert, wearing a gas mask, holds a plastic bag containing samples from one of the sites of an alleged chemical weapons attack in the Ain Tarma neighbourhood of Damascus, Syria August 29, 2013. REUTERS/Mohamed Abdullah/File Photo

UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - Russia cast a veto at the United Nations Security Council on Tuesday preventing the renewal of the mandate for a mission that investigates the use of chemical weapons in Syria.

The investigation by the United Nations and the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) - known as the Joint Investigative Mechanism (JIM) - was unanimously created by the 15-member U.N. Security Council in 2015 and renewed in 2016 for another year. Its mandate is due to expire in mid-November.

Limited time offer:
Just RM5 per month.

Monthly Plan

RM13.90/month
RM5/month

Billed as RM5/month for the 1st 6 months then RM13.90 thereafters.

Annual Plan

RM12.33/month

Billed as RM148.00/year

1 month

Free Trial

For new subscribers only


Cancel anytime. No ads. Auto-renewal. Unlimited access to the web and app. Personalised features. Members rewards.
Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
   

Next In World

Burkina Faso army executed over 220 villagers in February, HRW says
Yellen says range of options to deal with frozen Russian assets
Kenyan military deployed as East Africa floods kill dozens
Lukashenko talks up threats to Belarus to justify 'nuclear deterrence'
Italy's state TV journalists to strike over Meloni government's grip
Harvey Weinstein's conviction overturned by top New York court
Russia says it may downgrade ties with US if its assets are confiscated
Iraq hangs 11 convicted of terrorism in latest mass executions, security officials say
Spain prosecutor asks court to throw out corruption case against PM Sanchez's wife
India says US human rights report "deeply biased"

Others Also Read