Analysis - In removing stop-and-frisk judge, U.S. court enters rare territory


  • World
  • Friday, 01 Nov 2013

NEW YORK (Reuters) - In a series of interviews in May, U.S. District Judge Shira Scheindlin said federal judges are too cautious in exercising their creativity and independence.

On Thursday, her own efforts to avoid that pitfall landed her in trouble with the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which removed her from a high-profile case involving the New York City Police Department's controversial stop-and-frisk program. Her actions had compromised the appearance of impartiality, the court said.

Win a prize this Mother's Day by subscribing to our annual plan now! T&C applies.

Monthly Plan

RM13.90/month

Annual Plan

RM12.33/month

Billed as RM148.00/year

1 month

Free Trial

For new subscribers only


Cancel anytime. No ads. Auto-renewal. Unlimited access to the web and app. Personalised features. Members rewards.
Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
   

Next In World

Kai Cenat resolves NYC Union Square melee charges with apology, officials say
OpenAI unveils tool to detect DALL-E images
Australia raises minimum savings for student visa, warns on fake recruitment
Katy Perry and Rihanna didn’t attend the Met Gala. But AI-generated images still fooled fans
World's record-breaking temperature streak extends through April
How to update Chrome without accidentally installing a virus on your smartphone
AstraZeneca to withdraw Covid-19 vaccine globally as demand dips
North Korean propaganda chief who served all three leaders dies
North Macedonia votes in elections crucial for EU accession
U.S. crude oil inventories up last week: API

Others Also Read