Analysis - U.S. court takes small step to bridge ideological divide


People line up for admission at the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington October 1, 2012. REUTERS/Gary Cameron

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - It may never be clear what happened behind the scenes at the U.S. Supreme Court to yield Monday's compromise decision upholding university affirmative action. The case was heard in October, the first month of the term, and as the months went by and the justices deliberated in secret, the suspense grew.

Would this conservative-dominated court end university affirmative action? Closely watching were supporters who emphasized that education remains a gateway to opportunity for long-excluded blacks and Hispanics, as well as critics who said racial policies are unfair and no longer required in multicultural America.

Play, subscribe and stand a chance to win prizes worth over RM39,000! T&C applies.

Monthly Plan

RM 13.90/month

RM 11.12/month

Billed as RM 11.12 for the 1st month, RM 13.90 thereafter.

Best Value

Annual Plan

RM 12.33/month

RM 9.87/month

Billed as RM 118.40 for the 1st year, RM 148 thereafter.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Next In World

Pressure mounts on UK government to ban Kanye West after festival backlash
Seixas sets pace in tough opening stage in Tour of Basque Region
CBA Roundup: Shanghai extends winning streak to 16 games in CBA
Trump says Tuesday deadline to make a deal with Iran is final
Russia says Ukraine damaged CPC terminal on the Black Sea with drones
Iran rejects ceasefire as deadline nears on Trump 'hell' ultimatum
Iran rejects ceasefire in response to proposals and emphasises need for permanent end to war, IRNA says
Romanian court lifts judicial controls against Andrew Tate, pending investigation
Russian court sentences former governor to 14 years in prison for corruption
North Korea welcome's Seoul's expression of regret over drone incursion

Others Also Read