BERNAMA filepic
PUTRAJAYA: The Court of Appeal has reserved its decision on an appeal by Segambut MP Hannah Yeoh (pic) against a High Court ruling that dismissed her defamation suit against former inspector-general of police Tan Sri Musa Hassan.
A three-member bench chaired by Justice Datuk Azimah Omar deferred its decision after hearing submissions from Yeoh's counsel, Razlan Hadri Zulkifli, and Mohd Khairul Azam Abdul Aziz, representing Musa.
ALSO READ: High Court dismisses Hannah Yeoh's defamation suit against former IGP Musa
"We reserve our decision. We need time to deliberate and we have fixed Oct 21 for case management.
"The parties will be informed of the decision date during the case management," said Justice Azimah, who sat with Justices Datuk Dr Choo Kah Sing and Datuk Dr Shahnaz Sulaiman.
On Dec 23, the High Court dismissed Youth and Sports Minister Yeoh's suit after finding that she had failed to establish that Musa’s statements were defamatory.
Yeoh filed a suit in 2020 against Musa over statements made during a forum at UiTM on Jan 30 that year.
She claimed that, in his speech, Musa had among other things accused her of writing her book Becoming Hannah to turn Malaysia into a Christian nation, of having connections with evangelists and Jews to undermine Islam and Malaysia, and of prioritising her personal interests over the nation's.
Earlier, Razlan Hadri submitted that the High Court erred in finding that the slanderous statements by the respondent (Musa) were not defamatory because the respondent only made a "passing remark" towards the appellant.
"The slanderous statements refer to the appellant. The video of the statements was played in court and the High Court judicial commissioner (Arziah Mohamed Apandi) saw and heard the video. It was not just once, but up to three or four times," he said.
He further submitted that the High Court judicial commissioner found that there was no publication because the respondent had no knowledge that his speech would be broadcast by UiTM online and that there was allegedly minimal engagement on UiTM’s social media posts.
ALSO READ: Hannah Yeoh files appeal over dismissal of defamation suit against Musa Hassan
"We argue that the slanderous statements were published to third parties because they were made in an auditorium in UiTM in the presence of at least 50 UiTM officials, academics and students.
"The respondent was fully aware that his speech would be broadcast live. The statements were also reported by the media," he said, requesting RM1.5mil in general damages and RM500,000 in aggravated damages if the appellate court allows the appeal.
Meanwhile, Khairul Azam argued that his client's disclosure in the forum was based on Yeoh's own book as well as studies by academic experts.
"The High Court did not err in terms of law or fact in rejecting the appellant's claim," he said. – Bernama
