Appeals court defers decision on Hannah Yeoh's challenge to dismissal of lawsuit against Musa Hassan


BERNAMA filepic

PUTRAJAYA: The Court of Appeal has reserved its decision on an appeal by Segambut MP Hannah Yeoh (pic) against a High Court ruling that dismissed her defamation suit against former inspector-general of police Tan Sri Musa Hassan.

A three-member bench chaired by Justice Datuk Azimah Omar deferred its decision after hearing submissions from Yeoh's counsel, Razlan Hadri Zulkifli, and Mohd Khairul Azam Abdul Aziz, representing Musa.

ALSO READ: High Court dismisses Hannah Yeoh's defamation suit against former IGP Musa

"We reserve our decision. We need time to deliberate and we have fixed Oct 21 for case management.

"The parties will be informed of the decision date during the case management," said Justice Azimah, who sat with Justices Datuk Dr Choo Kah Sing and Datuk Dr Shahnaz Sulaiman.

On Dec 23, the High Court dismissed Youth and Sports Minister Yeoh's suit after finding that she had failed to establish that Musa’s statements were defamatory.

Yeoh filed a suit in 2020 against Musa over statements made during a forum at UiTM on Jan 30 that year.

She claimed that, in his speech, Musa had among other things accused her of writing her book Becoming Hannah to turn Malaysia into a Christian nation, of having connections with evangelists and Jews to undermine Islam and Malaysia, and of prioritising her personal interests over the nation's.

Earlier, Razlan Hadri submitted that the High Court erred in finding that the slanderous statements by the respondent (Musa) were not defamatory because the respondent only made a "passing remark" towards the appellant. 

"The slanderous statements refer to the appellant. The video of the statements was played in court and the High Court judicial commissioner (Arziah Mohamed Apandi) saw and heard the video. It was not just once, but up to three or four times," he said.

He further submitted that the High Court judicial commissioner found that there was no publication because the respondent had no knowledge that his speech would be broadcast by UiTM online and that there was allegedly minimal engagement on UiTM’s social media posts.

ALSO READ: Hannah Yeoh files appeal over dismissal of defamation suit against Musa Hassan

"We argue that the slanderous statements were published to third parties because they were made in an auditorium in UiTM in the presence of at least 50 UiTM officials, academics and students.

"The respondent was fully aware that his speech would be broadcast live. The statements were also reported by the media," he said, requesting RM1.5mil in general damages and RM500,000 in aggravated damages if the appellate court allows the appeal.

Meanwhile, Khairul Azam argued that his client's disclosure in the forum was based on Yeoh's own book as well as studies by academic experts.

"The High Court did not err in terms of law or fact in rejecting the appellant's claim," he said. – Bernama

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Next In Nation

Court of Appeal sets aside RM1.1mil damages awarded to Ivana Smit’s family
Bukit Aman sending team to probe drug bust in Japan involving M'sians
Chile honours two Malaysians for contributions to bilateral ties
Unhealthy air across 27 areas as of 10am with Pasir Gudang worst at 177
SST remains government’s preferred tax system, says Ministry
Malaysian youths rack up RM5.4bil in Buy Now, Pay Later purchases
Nearly 20,000 domestic violence cases recorded since 2024, Dewan Rakyat told
Over 4,000 school bullying cases recorded between March and August, Dewan Rakyat told
Sepang F1 Race injected nearly RM950mil into economy, Parliament told
‘Alibaba’ licences, Gaza, troubled housing project among Parliament's focus today

Others Also Read