I was not asked to assess RM1mil received by Shahrir, says LHDN officer

KUALA LUMPUR: An officer of the Inland Revenue Board (LHDN) told the High Court here that an investigating officer of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) did not ask him to make an assessment to determine whether a sum of RM1mil allegedly received by Tan Sri Shahrir Ab Samad was regarded as income or not.

Deputy head of the Celebrity, Public and Various Entertainers Desk Audit Unit, LHDN Assessment Division, Tuan Zulkfli Tuan Lah, 48, said the investigating officer also did not furnish any documents relating to the receipt of the RM1mil, but merely told him that Shahrir received the money.

He said this when cross-examined by lawyer Datuk Syed Faisal Al-Edros Syed Abdullah Al-Edros, who is representing Shahrir in the former Johor Baru MP’s trial on a charge of failing to declare to LHDN RM1mil, which he received from former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak via an AmIslamic Bank Berhad cheque dated Nov 27, 2013.

Syed Faisal Al-Edros: If we want to determine whether the RM1mil which Tan Sri Shahrir received amounted to an income or not, the best way to do it is with a tax assessor like Tuan Zul yourself?

Tuan Zulkfli: Correct.

The 21st prosecution witness also agreed with the lawyer that it was within LHDN’s jurisdiction to determine whether the RM1mil received by Shahrir was considered income or not.

Asked if the investigating officer told him that Shahrir had talked about not wanting to contest (in JB seat) when he met then Barisan Nasional chairman (Najib) a few months after Shahrir won the Johor Baru parliamentary seat because his savings had been used to revive the abandoned Puri Langkasuka project in Larkin, Tuan Zulkfli said "No”.

Syed Faisal Al-Edros: When the Barisan chairman heard about this matter, he issued a cheque for RM1mil to him (Shahrir), which was what led to this charge. So, did the investigating officer tell Tuan Zulkfli about the issuance of the cheque?

Tuan Zulkfli: Not issuance of the cheque but that the recipient (Shahrir) received the RM1mil cheque.

Following this answer by the witness, the lawyer again asked whether he knew and was told by the investigating officer about the history leading to the receipt of the RM1mil, Tuan Zulkfli said "No”.

The witness said he was not sure when the lawyer suggested that the RM1mil received by Shahrir was not taxable income because it was money entrusted to him to be spent on the Puri Langkasuka project and not for his personal use.

Shahrir, 72, is alleged to have been involved in money laundering by not reporting his actual income in the income tax return form with regard to the RM1mil, which contravenes Section 113(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act 1967.

He allegedly committed the act at the LHDN Duta branch, Government Office Complex, Jalan Tuanku Abdul Halim here on April 25, 2014.

The charge, framed under Section 4(1) of the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act 2001, provides for a maximum fine of RM5mil or imprisonment of up to five years, or both, on conviction.

Hearing before Justice Muhammad Jamil Hussin continues on Nov 4. - Bernama

Article type: free
User access status:
Subscribe now to our Premium Plan for an ad-free and unlimited reading experience!

Court , Shahrir Samad , Najib Razak , LHDN , MACC


Next In Nation

Najib allowed by court to file third-party notices against former SRC directors
Bella case: Court dismisses Siti Bainun's application for statements of prosecution witnesses
Selangor DOE detains three containers with ewaste from US, Spain
Slope collapse closes stretch of Jalan Tampin-Kuala Pilah-Manchis route
Op Saga: Over 200 arrested nationwide for illegal gambling during the World Cup, says Bukit Aman
Not being Cabinet Minister gives me more time to contribute, says Hishammuddin
RM600bil issue: MACC's probe to focus on RM92.5bil only
Govt committed to implementing climate actions, address climate change
Annuar among three divisional leaders sacked by Umno, says Ahmad Maslan
Construction industry struggling to keep up after second cement price hike, urge govt intervention

Others Also Read