IGP and govt file appeal against High Court's decision over Indira Gandhi's suit


KUALA LUMPUR (Bernama): The Inspector-General of Police (IGP) and the government have filed an appeal against the High Court's decision dismissing their application to quash M. Indira Gandhi's suit over the authorities' alleged failure to arrest her ex-husband Muhammad Riduan and return her daughter who was abducted by the convert 12 years ago.

Indira Gandhi filed the suit on Oct 28, 2020, naming the IGP, the Royal Malaysia Police, the Home Ministry and the Malaysian government as the first to fourth defendants.

The IGP, police, Home Ministry and the government filed the notice of appeal in the Court of Appeal on Aug 13 after being dissatisfied with the overall decision of High Court Judge Mohd Nazlan Mohd Ghazali on July 16.

Senior Federal Counsel Andi Razalijaya A Dadi, who represents the appellants, said a copy of the notice of appeal had been submitted to the counsel representing Indira Gandhi via email on Aug 16.

On July 16, Judge Mohd Nazlan dismissed the application of the defendants, on the grounds that the case was not obviously unsustainable to warrant summary dismissal, and ordered that a full trial be held on the defamation suit filed by Indira Gandhi.

In her statement of claim, kindergarten teacher Indira Gandhi, 46, claimed that the IGP deliberately and negligently ignored the Federal Court's mandamus order for failing to investigate or take appropriate action to recover her daughter, Prasana Diksa, who is now 13 years old.

She claimed that all defendants had a role to play in making decisions or ordering the police to execute the committal warrant against her ex-husband, as ordered by the Federal Court on April 29, 2016.

The woman contended that the behaviour of all the defendants had directly caused her separation from her youngest daughter to continue until today, and that their behaviour had also caused Muhammad Riduan to flee.

She is seeking RM100mil in general, aggravated and exemplary damages, as well as a declaration that the first defendant (IGP) had committed the tort of nonfeasance in public office, and the second, third and fourth defendants were also vicariously liable for the tort of nonfeasance committed by the first defendant. – Bernama

Article type: metered
User Type: anonymous web
User Status:
Campaign ID: 46
Cxense type: free
User access status: 3
Join our Telegram channel to get our Evening Alerts and breaking news highlights

Indira Gandhi , Lawsuit , IGP , Appeal , Police , Home Ministry

   

Next In Nation

Melaka polls: Norhizam will not be a Pakatan candidate, says Anwar
Papar declared African Swine Fever zone
No report lodged about sexual assault on Nur Sajat, say police
Government studying best mechanism to implement digital economy tax
Court allows prosecution's bid to impeach Rosmah
Covid-19: Sinovac recipients will get Comirnaty as booster shot, says Khairy
Khairy: Hospitalisations due to Covid-19 is on the increase in S'gor, Putrajaya and Sarawak
Businessmen with palace as address plead not guilty to giving false information
Cyber security among key aspects in future planning of FPDA, says Hishammuddin
Abang Johari: State election not discussed with Sultan Nazrin, only Covid-19 matters

Others Also Read


Vouchers