IGP and govt file appeal against High Court's decision over Indira Gandhi's suit

  • Nation
  • Friday, 27 Aug 2021

KUALA LUMPUR (Bernama): The Inspector-General of Police (IGP) and the government have filed an appeal against the High Court's decision dismissing their application to quash M. Indira Gandhi's suit over the authorities' alleged failure to arrest her ex-husband Muhammad Riduan and return her daughter who was abducted by the convert 12 years ago.

Indira Gandhi filed the suit on Oct 28, 2020, naming the IGP, the Royal Malaysia Police, the Home Ministry and the Malaysian government as the first to fourth defendants.

The IGP, police, Home Ministry and the government filed the notice of appeal in the Court of Appeal on Aug 13 after being dissatisfied with the overall decision of High Court Judge Mohd Nazlan Mohd Ghazali on July 16.

Senior Federal Counsel Andi Razalijaya A Dadi, who represents the appellants, said a copy of the notice of appeal had been submitted to the counsel representing Indira Gandhi via email on Aug 16.

On July 16, Judge Mohd Nazlan dismissed the application of the defendants, on the grounds that the case was not obviously unsustainable to warrant summary dismissal, and ordered that a full trial be held on the defamation suit filed by Indira Gandhi.

In her statement of claim, kindergarten teacher Indira Gandhi, 46, claimed that the IGP deliberately and negligently ignored the Federal Court's mandamus order for failing to investigate or take appropriate action to recover her daughter, Prasana Diksa, who is now 13 years old.

She claimed that all defendants had a role to play in making decisions or ordering the police to execute the committal warrant against her ex-husband, as ordered by the Federal Court on April 29, 2016.

The woman contended that the behaviour of all the defendants had directly caused her separation from her youngest daughter to continue until today, and that their behaviour had also caused Muhammad Riduan to flee.

She is seeking RM100mil in general, aggravated and exemplary damages, as well as a declaration that the first defendant (IGP) had committed the tort of nonfeasance in public office, and the second, third and fourth defendants were also vicariously liable for the tort of nonfeasance committed by the first defendant. – Bernama

Article type: metered
User Type: anonymous web
User Status:
Campaign ID: 1
Cxense type: free
User access status: 3
Subscribe now to our Premium Plan for an ad-free and unlimited reading experience!

Indira Gandhi , Lawsuit , IGP , Appeal , Police , Home Ministry


Next In Nation

Malaysia regains Cat 1 International Aviation Safety Assessment safety rating, says Dr Wee
PM to seek audience with King to present potential parliament dissolution dates
PM to seek audience with King to present possible Parliament dissolution dates
Over RM8.8mil claimed in child car seat rebates, says Miros
Umno top five reach consensus on GE15, but date still opaque
Black panther caught in Semenyih housing estate
MACC chief among those in Sabah Governor's birthday honour list
Shah Alam stadium to be demolished, new state-of-the-art facility to be built in its place
Umno supreme council members arrive for special meeting
Telecommunication tower to be built in Danum Valley, says Comms Ministry sec-gen

Others Also Read