Najib's lawyer chided for describing SRC trial judge as 'hopelessly incompetent'


  • Nation
  • Tuesday, 06 Apr 2021

PUTRAJAYA: An Appeals Court judge in the SRC International Sdn Bhd appeal has told lead lawyer Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah (pic) to be more respectful when describing a judge's competency.

The senior lawyer had described High Court judge Justice Mohd Nazlan Mohd Ghazali who convicted his client Datuk Seri Najib Razak as "hopelessly incompetent" and that the trial judge had "poisoned" his own grounds of judgment by adding elements that were previously not there in his decision.

Justice Abdul Karim Abdul Jalil, who chairs a three-man bench, stopped Muhammad Shafee when he was giving his submission.

"Find a better adjective to describe him. Give respect to the judge. Use words like 'grossly erred', 'he had misdirected himself'... not just to say he is 'hopelessly incompetent'," Justice Abdul Karim said here on Tuesday (April 6).

Muhammad Shafee then asked if he could say that the trial judge had "demonstrated incompetence", to which Justice Abdul Karim said yes.

"Clearly, he (Justice Mohd Nazlan) demonstrated incompetence," Muhammad Shafee corrected himself.

The lawyer then told the judge that he "could not pull punches".

Justice Abdul Karim said he could still do so, but respectfully.

"... with a bit more decorum... All right," Muhammad Shafee responded.

Earlier, Muhammad Shafee submitted to the court that his client did not get a fair trial in the case.

He said the trial judge had incorporated additional elements in his grounds of judgment and record of proceedings and questioned whether the judge had poisoned his own judgment by doing so.

"Has the poison occurred to his grounds of judgment that the Court of Appeal would now have to relook into the grounds, fresh?" Muhammad Shafee said.

At the beginning of the appeal on Monday (April 5), Muhammad Shafee submitted that Justice Mohd Nazlan had stated that the prosecution had established a prima facie case in his oral grounds.

However, in his written judgment after convicting Najib, the judge had included additional reasons why his client was asked to enter his defence, Muhammad Shafee said.

The lawyer said it was prejudicial to the accused and a serious misdirection by the judge.

Tuesday (April 6) marks the second day of Najib's appeal in the SRC International case.

The former premier's defence team had submitted 307 grounds on why he should be cleared of the charges in his petition of appeal.

On July 28 last year, Justice Mohd Nazlan sentenced Najib to 10 years' jail on each of the three counts of CBT as well as each of the three counts of money laundering.

Najib was also sentenced to 12 years' prison and handed a RM210mil fine, in default five years' jail, in the case of abuse of position.

Najib, 68, is currently out on bail of RM2mil in two sureties pending appeal.

Other judges on the bench are Justices Has Zanah Mehat and Vazeer Alam Mydin Meera.

Article type: metered
User Type: anonymous web
User Status:
Campaign ID: 1
Cxense type: free
User access status: 3
Join our Telegram channel to get our Evening Alerts and breaking news highlights
   

Next In Nation

Nur Jazlan brands PAS politicians as ‘cap ayam’
Swedish tourist rescues five pups in KL, four up for adoption at MDDB on July 3
Improve on policies to ensure food security, urge student unions
Segambut MCA organises special auction to drum up funds for new teaching hospital
Muhyiddin meets PM, discusses DPM post
RON95, diesel supply issues in Kapit resolved
Warisan feels vindicated with PBS statement over IC issuance by a Barisan component
Let government, rakyat decide if NRC had failed or not, says Muhyiddin
Man arrested for beating father in argument
Cops arrest 19 for rioting in Ara Damansara

Others Also Read