Ex sec-gen says he was told to rush contract signing


  • Nation
  • Thursday, 12 Mar 2020

Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor. - filepic

KUALA LUMPUR: The High Court was told that Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor asked the former secretary-general of the Education Ministry (MOE), Datuk Seri Alias Ahmad, to speed up the process of signing the contract for a hybrid solar project in Sarawak.

Alias, 62, said the wife of the former prime minister had also asked him when the contract could be signed because progress payments could not be made if it was not signed.

‘’I told her Syarikat Jepak (Jepak Holdings Sdn Bhd) could not complete the draft of the contract documents to be scrutinised by MOE, ’’ he said at the examination-in-chief by Deputy Public Prosecutor Raya Mohd Farizul Hassan Bakri.

The witness was giving his statement on the 13th day of the trial of Rosmah, 68.

She is charged with seeking RM187.5mil and two counts of receiving a bribe of RM6.5mil from Jepak Holdings managing director Saidi Abang Samsudin through her former assistant Datuk Rizal Mansor as gratifications to help Jepak Holdings secure the Hybrid Photovoltaic Solar System Integrated Project and Maintenance and Operation of Genset/Diesel for 369 rural schools in Sarawak worth RM1.25bil through direct negotiation from MOE.

She allegedly committed the offences at three places, namely Lygon Cafe at Sunway Putra Mall in Jalan Putra, her house in Jalan Langgak Duta, Taman Duta, and at Seri Perdana in Precinct 10, Putrajaya between January 2016 and Sept 7,2017.

Reading his witness statement, Alias, who held the post from Sept 5,2016, until his retirement on May 22,2018, said Rosmah had also asked him on the development of the advance payment to Jepak Holdings and when it could be made because the company could not move without the payment.

“I told her that there was an issue concerning the insurance used by the company, which was not approved by the Ministry of Finance (MOF), and without the approval of MOF for the insurance, payment could not be made, and if it (payment) was still made, it contravened the government’s acquisition process, ’’ said the 12th prosecution witness.

Alias said Rosmah asked him on the development of the project after a meeting of the Permata Malaysia Foundation board of trustees.

He could not recall the actual date of the meeting but stated that it took place when the issue of advance payment cropped up and prior to the official date of the signing of the contract.

According to the witness, he viewed Rosmah’s questions seriously because they came from the wife of the prime minister and had directed his officers to seek solutions to the problems of Jepak Holdings related to the advance payment, progress payments and preparation of the contract documents.

‘’As far as I can remember, the contract for the project was signed on June 20,2017, whereby, at that time I had signed the documents of the contract together with Jepak which was represented by its director Saidi Abang Samsudin, ’’ he said.

The atmosphere became a bit tense during the cross examination by lawyer Datuk Akberdin Abdul Kadir representing Rosmah, when Alias did not agree with the lawyer’s suggestion that his action in issuing the Letter of Acceptance (SST) to Jepak Holdings on the solar project contravened a letter from MOF, which did not approve the application of additional allocation submitted by MOE for the solar project.

Akberdin: If the MOF does not approve the application for additional allocation, your action in issuing the SST was a deed which disregarded the reply from MOF because MOF did not approve (the additional allocation).

Alias: Not true, because it was not me who issued the SST. My signature is not on the SST.

Akberdin: You are lying to the court. You want to say that as the controlling officer you were not informed or did not know when the SST was issued (to Jepak Holdings)?.

Alias: Agreed, I don’t know.

The trial took place before judge Mohamed Zaini Mazlan. — Bernama

Article type: free
User access status:

rosmah , graft ,

   

Did you find this article insightful?

Yes
No

Across The Star Online