Parties in ex-minister Tajuddin's suit against Khalid Samad advised to settle case


  • Nation
  • Wednesday, 12 Sep 2018

KUALA LUMPUR: Parties in the suit filed by former Deputy Agriculture and Agro-based Industry Minister Datuk Seri Tajuddin Abdul Rahman against Shah Alam MP Khalid Samad and two others have been advised to go for a settlement.

Tajuddin filed the suit against Khalid, The New Straits Times Press (M) Bhd and KiniTv Sdn Bhd over a series of press conferences in 2016.

Khalid's lawyer K. Murali told reporters that High Court Judicial Commissioner Aliza Sulaiman has urged parties to try to settle the matter, adding that so far, no proposal from any parties yet.

"The court also fixed hearing from Nov 1 to 2, Dec 3 and 6," he said after parties met JC Aliza in chambers on Wednesday (Sept 12).

In the suit filed on April 26 last year, Tajuddin named Khalid, NSTP and KiniTV as the defendants.

He claimed that on Nov 21, 2016, Khalid held a press conference at the Parliament lobby and the statement was published as a YouTube video the same day.

The plaintiff said the statement was defamatory.

The Pasir Salak MP alleged that part of the statement was published by second defendant NSTP in the New Straits Times on Nov 22, 2016, as an article entitled "Fury over Deputy Minister's Remark".

Tajuddin, an Umno Supreme Council member, said the defamatory statement had damaged his reputation and standing and have brought him into public ridicule, odium and contempt.
He said he sent a notice of demand on Nov 23, 2016, seeking among others, the retraction of the defamatory statements in the newspaper and an apology for the said defamatory statements.

He claimed that Khalid, through his solicitors on Nov 28, refused to apologise and denied the statements were defamatory.

Khalid then held a second press conference on Nov 24, 2016, at the Parliament lobby and his second statement was published by KiniTV as a video the same day and still continues to be published at its KiniTV and Malaysia Kini's sites.

He said the words in the second defamatory statement in it's natural and ordinary meaning meant that he had resorted to sending his children, relatives and supporters to physically assault the defendant (Khalid) and was a violent person.

He is claiming general damages; aggravated and exemplary damages; cost; and any or other reliefs deemed fit by the court.

Limited time offer:
Just RM5 per month.

Monthly Plan

RM13.90/month
RM5/month

Billed as RM5/month for the 1st 6 months then RM13.90 thereafters.

Annual Plan

RM12.33/month

Billed as RM148.00/year

1 month

Free Trial

For new subscribers only


Cancel anytime. No ads. Auto-renewal. Unlimited access to the web and app. Personalised features. Members rewards.
Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
   

Next In Nation

Johor Baru housewife loses RM400,000 in phone scam
Malaysian parliamentary delegation visits UK, Ireland to enhance expertise
KLIA shooting: Suspect to be charged in Kota Baru on April 24
Copter tragedy: Twin sisters in tears over mother's death
Internal power tussle in SME Association of Malaysia sees president booted
Copter tragedy: 'Dad didn't speak much but he always took care of us'
Copter tragedy: Families still reeling from loss
Copter tragedy: Friends see Lt Cmdr Wan Rezaudeen as a hero
Copter tragedy: Victims' remains arrive at HRPB for post-mortem
Proposed amendments to Syariah Courts Act in document preparation stage, says Mohd Na'im

Others Also Read