Dr Mahathir’s bid to nullify forex RCI findings set for Aug 28


  • Nation
  • Monday, 25 Jun 2018

Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, who mooted the idea during his visit to Japan, had explained that the suggestion originated from the private sector.

KUALA LUMPUR: Lawyers representing Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad in his lawsuit to nullify the Royal Commission of Inquiry's (RCI) findings on Bank Negara's foreign exchange losses in the 1990s are still waiting for instructions on whether to continue or withdraw the suit.

One of the lawyers, Mohd Irzan Iswatt Mohd Noor, said the lead counsel, Mohamed Haniff Khatri Abdulla, was still not able to meet the prime minister to obtain further instructions on the matter.

“We are not able to meet with Dr Mahathir yet. We are still waiting for his instruction to either continue the case, or otherwise,” he said, adding that the court on Monday fixed Aug 28 to hear an application for preliminary objection by the defendants.

He told this to reporters after management of the case before High Court judge Datuk Azizah Nawawi.

Also present was senior federal counsel Mazlifah Ayob, who represented the defendants named in the suit, comprising RCI members – Tan Sri Mohd Sidek Hassan, Datuk Wira Kamaludin Md Said, Datuk Seri Tajuddin Atan, Tan Sri Saw Choo Boon, K.Pushpanathanan, Datuk Dr Yusof Ismail – and former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak, the cabinet members and the government.

Dr Mahathir filed the suit in December 2017 seeking to declare the report by RCI on Bank Negara Malaysia's forex trading losses as null and void as it excluded legal documents of witnesses and notes of proceedings.

He is seeking to declare the RCI's report on the Bank Negara's losses due to forex trading in the 1990s was illegal, incomplete and defective as it lacked proceeding notes, and written and oral submissions through transcription or video recording.

He is also seeking a declaration that any report by a Royal Commission of Inquiry set up undet the Commission of Enquiry Act 1950 would only be legal and in order if it had all the written statements by the witnesses who testified in the proceeding, the proceeding notes, the submissions, and the findings. – Bernama

Limited time offer:
Just RM5 per month.

Monthly Plan

RM13.90/month
RM5/month

Billed as RM5/month for the 1st 6 months then RM13.90 thereafters.

Annual Plan

RM12.33/month

Billed as RM148.00/year

1 month

Free Trial

For new subscribers only


Cancel anytime. No ads. Auto-renewal. Unlimited access to the web and app. Personalised features. Members rewards.
Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
   

Next In Nation

Cops beef up KLIA security with GOF personnel
Ornamental fish industry worth over RM450mil and growing
Banks and telemarketers must innovate to avoid being mistaken for scammers, says CCID director
Local airlines resuming flights from Sabah, Sarawak following volcanic eruption
Upswing in SMS scams, says Bukit Aman
Muar has good feng shui too, so give us allocations, Syed Saddiq tells Nga
Opaque EIA process can harm Sabah's biodiversity, says WWF-Malaysia
Malaysia dismayed by veto of Palestine's bid for UN membership
Health, Higher Education ministries to jointly address issues with parallel pathway programme
Former Kuala Krau MP admits to dumping mounds of rice, food items

Others Also Read