Lahad Datu invasion verdict on Feb 5

  • Nation Premium
  • Monday, 25 Jan 2016

Filepix showing some of the accused arriving at the High Court for the trial

Ram Singh, counsel for Mohamad Ali Ahmad, said none of the witnesses who testified against his client could link his actions to two charges he faces - waging war and being a member of a terrorist group.

Counsels for the other local men - Abdul Gani Zelika, for Abd Hadi Mawan, and Putli Noor Asikin Datu Gulam (Pabblo Alie) - contended the evidence against their clients was based on hearsay.

Article type: metered
User access status: 3
Join our Telegram channel to get our Evening Alerts and breaking news highlights

Next In Nation

Saravanan to iron out maid issues during Jakarta visit Premium
King consents to RCI on Tabung Haji Premium
Reps: No mention of polls Premium
PM: All should accept SC’s findings Premium
DBKL: Retailers given grace period to sell hard liquor Premium
Living in the endemic phase Premium
Most cases in Categories 1 and 2, says Health DG Premium
Call to revisit Bill imposing heavier fines for Covid-19 offences Premium
Sold out VTL-Land tickets put a damper on CNY plans Premium
‘Ensure SOP is adhered to’ Premium

Others Also Read