Federal Court reserves decision on Pensiangan polls

  • Nation
  • Thursday, 12 Feb 2009

KOTA KINABALU: The Federal Court on Thursday reserved decision in an appeal by Parti Bersatu Rakyat Sabah (PBRs) president Tan Sri Joseph Kurup to quash the nullification of his election to the Pensiangan parliamentary seat in the March 8 general election.

Appeal Court President Tan Sri Alauddin Mohd Sheriff, who sat with Chief Justice of Malaya Datuk Arifin Zakaria and Federal Court judge Datuk Nik Hashim Abd Rahman, said the judgment would be delivered at a date yet to be fixed.

Kurup, represented by leading counsel, Mariati Robert, wanted the country's highest court to set aside the Election Court's decision declaring Pensiangan election result null and void.

Kurup won the seat unopposed on nomination day in the 12th general election after the returning officer rejected the nomination papers of Danny Anthony Andipai of Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) and another candidate.

He was subsequently appointed Deputy Rural and Regional Development Minister.

Andipai then petitioned to the election court to nullify the election result, naming Kurup and the returning officer, Bubudan OT Majalu, as respondents.

Election judge David Wong Tak Wah, in allowing the petition on Sept 8 last year, ruled that the wrongful rejection of the nomination papers had breached Andipai's constitutional right to take part in the election and the written law relating to the conduct of the election.

In his 36-page judgment, Wong said the decision of the deputy director of the Sabah Election Commission to accept Andipai's nomination papers was final and could not be overruled by the returning officer, Bubudan OT Majalu, under the pretext that there was an objection during the objection period.

The deputy director was exercising a power provided for by law in making the decision and Bubudan's decision to uphold the objection was a wrong decision, he ruled.

Senior federal counsel Firoz Hussein Ahmad Jamaluddin, in his submission Thursday, said the election judge had failed to observe that Andipai did not comply with any election law when arguing on Section 32B of the Election Offences Act.

He said it was stipulated that nomination papers should be submitted between 9am and 10am but Andipai submitted his papers at 10.25am, which was beyond the stipulated time. - Bernama

Earlier story: Court set to hear appeals

Article type: metered
User Type: anonymous web
User Status:
Campaign ID: 1
Cxense type: free
User access status: 3

Did you find this article insightful?


Next In Nation

Malaysian cleared of four drug charges in Singapore, walks out a free man
Covid-19: No reason to have misgivings about vaccines
Covid-19: First batch of AstraZeneca vaccine expected to arrive in second quarter
Two fined RM1,000 each for violating EMCO in Sibu
‘Let non-govt clinics, hospitals join vaccine drive’
You can refuse to deal with anti-vaxxers, consumers told
Politicians counter dubious claims about vaccines
Fight the fake, vaccinate!
Cops to crack down on anti-vaccine instigators
Why I choose to be Covid-19 lab rat

Stories You'll Enjoy