New to science, but not to Borneo


The rainforest in Borneo, where ‘Pinanga subterranea’, which flowers underground, grows. The palm is one of 74 plants that scientists from the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, in London named as new to science last year. — ©2024 The New York Times Company

AS a group of European botanists prepared to travel across Borneo by motorboat and four-wheel-drive vehicles, they heard about a species of palm with an extremely rare quirk.

It flowers underground.

The palm, Pinanga subterranea, is one of 74 plants that scientists from the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, in London named last year as new to science, thrilling some in the botany world.

The botanists who went plant-hunting in South-East Asia six years ago were not expecting to find it.

But the plant is not hard to find: it grows abundantly on Borneo, the third-largest island in the world, which includes parts of Indonesia and Malaysia.

It is also not “new” because local indigenous groups have known about it, two representatives for those groups said in interviews.

In that sense, the “discovery” of Pinanga subterranea is an example of conventional science catching up with indigenous knowledge.

“We have described this as new to science,” said William Baker, the most senior scientist on the trip.

“But the preexisting knowledge about this palm is layered and was already there before we even got anywhere near it.”

The ‘Pinanga subterranea’ palm and its fruit, which flowers underground. — ©2024 The New York Times CompanyThe ‘Pinanga subterranea’ palm and its fruit, which flowers underground. — ©2024 The New York Times Company

Over the past 30 years, non-indigenous scientists have turned more to indigenous knowledge to expand or test their research, with varying degrees of sensitivity.

In some cases, this has been seen as cultural appropriation, said George Nicholas, an archaeologist at Simon Fraser University in British Columbia who has written about the issue.

Indigenous peoples have raised complaints of scientific colonialism, particularly when researchers seek to develop drugs based on untapped sources of traditional knowledge, he said.

There have been a number of collaborative studies that credit indigenous communities with having generations of wisdom on topics that include shellfish productivity, grizzly bear management and raptor behaviour.

In some cases, the communities lead or participate in the research.

Such collaborations are partly a function of non-indigenous scientists acknowledging gaps in their knowledge, but there is often a hesitancy within indigenous communities to share information with outsiders, said Lynette Russell, an anthropological historian at Monash University in Australia.

“In order to share, you really need to get to know the researchers,” she added. “That’s not something you can necessarily do by a fly-in, fly-out visit.”

Its fruit, which flowers underground. — ©2024 The New York Times CompanyIts fruit, which flowers underground. — ©2024 The New York Times Company

In the case of the palm that flowers underground, the Kew scientists did not learn about it directly from indigenous groups, but from Paul Chai, a Malaysian scientist from Borneo who had first encountered it about 20 years earlier.

In October 2018, over laksa and tea in Kuching, Sarawak, Chai told them about the plant as they were preparing to visit a wildlife sanctuary on an unrelated botanical expedition.

Chai, now 82, had learned that members of a local indigenous group, the Kenyah, sometimes chewed the fruit of the plant with betel leaves.

The Kenyah are a subgroup of a Borneo indigenous tribe known as the Dayak. Their livelihood revolves around harvesting forest products, including agarwood, a valuable ingredient in perfume.

Dayak people typically learn about plants from their parents, and the forest is so important to them that an indigenous idiom likens it to breast milk, said Seting Beraan, a member of the Dayak and a regional chair with the Alliance of Indigenous Peoples of the Archipelago, an Indonesian non-profit that represents several groups.

“When we were going to the forests as kids, our parents would say, ‘Don’t eat that, it can make you sick’ or ‘This can cure fever,’ or that we could eat the fruit straightaway,” she said.

As for Pinanga subterranea, the Kew researchers weren’t the only scientists to find it.

Around the same time, Indonesian botanist Agusti Randi was learning its local indigenous names and planting its seeds in his garden on another part of Borneo.

When the Kew scientists later told Agusti about their Borneo research, he said he had seen it as well, Baker said.

So, the Kew crew, along with Chai, teamed up with Agusti to write a paper about the plant that was published last year in the scientific journal Palms.

Scott Zona, a botanist in North Carolina and co-editor of Palms, said Pinanga subterranea was “the palm discovery of 2023, if not the decade.”

He added that further research on it could help explain the evolutionary pressures that drive some plants underground.

Agusti, lead author of the study, said he thinks the plant might bloom underground – where there are fewer predators – to protect its flowers.

The only other known plant species that flower and fruit underground belong to a mysterious genus of orchid in Australia.

Baker said the plant’s underground activity makes it almost impossible to study. How would one analyse its pollination process without disrupting it or decide which specimen to target in the first place?

“Its undergroundness is probably what has prevented botanists from properly ‘discovering’ it, in inverted commas,” he added.

“Generally, when we go collecting, we don’t collect things that aren’t flowering and fruiting.” — ©2024 The New York Times Company

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

StarExtra

   

Next In Focus

Iraq’s crumbling school system
A desperate ‘sand’ of urgency
Gold hunters risk death and debt
The cruelty of exposing outdoor workers to extreme heat
Nato without America
Ukraine aid: A ‘good return on investment’
A global hysteria
Trump 1.0 made some world leaders laugh. Trump 2.0 terrifies them
Think life just keeps getting worse? Try being nostalgic – for the present
Migrant workers in the USA: Essential labour

Others Also Read