WHEN Prince Harry and his wife, Meghan Markle, decamped Britain for the United States in 2020, he portrayed it as an act of survival against a relentlessly intrusive British press. Recently, after a chaotic encounter with photographers in New York City, Harry found the media glare can be just as intense in his adopted home.
With details continuing to filter out about what exactly happened to Harry, Meghan and her mother, Doria Ragland, as photographers pursued them in midtown Manhattan, the episode underscored a basic paradox in the lives of this celebrity couple: they plead for privacy but also seek publicity, with a Netflix documentary, a tell-all memoir by Harry and public appearances that will inevitably draw cameras.
The frenzy in New York is a reminder of the grievances that Harry has held for decades against the British press, which remains the primary market for paparazzi shots of him and Meghan.
In 1997, his mother, Princess Diana, died in a car crash in Paris while fleeing photographers; Harry has blamed them for her death and expressed fears that history could repeat itself with his wife and family.
But the episode also illustrates a dilemma for Harry: even the involvement of the New York Police Department did not spare his family being swarmed by paparazzi, who pursued them even after they took refuge in a police station.
The role of the police in the incident is drawing attention in London because Harry has filed a legal challenge against Britain’s Home Office, after it rejected his request for the Metropolitan Police to provide protection to him and his family when they visit Britain.
“The example of what happened in New York suggests that the kind of police protection Harry wants in London is not going to be enough to protect him or his family,” said Ed Owens, a historian who has studied relations between the monarchy and the media. “He’s not engaging with this reality.”
In California, where they now live, Harry and Meghan employ private security guards who are licensed to carry guns.
But they are not allowed to travel with armed guards in Britain, which is one reason Harry has asked for police protection, and has offered to pay for it himself. Lawyers for the Home Office argued in court that police officers should not be hired out to paying customers.
Harry has described the loss of his security detail as one of the most worrisome consequences of his bitter split from his family and his withdrawal from royal duties.
In his memoir, Spare, he wrote that from childhood, he had never travelled without three armed bodyguards. During negotiations with palace officials over his new status, Harry said, he begged for the bodyguards to be left in place, even if he lost all the other royal perks.
“I offered to defray the cost of security out of my own pocket,” he wrote. “I wasn’t sure how I’d do that, but I’d find a way.”
The burden of paying for round-the-clock security, people who know the couple say, is one of the reasons Harry and Meghan have struck lucrative publishing and programming deals with Netflix and Penguin Random House.
In a statement, the couple’s spokesperson suggested that the threat posed by the photographers was as much to pedestrians, other motorists and police officers as to the couple or Ragland. It described “a near catastrophic car chase at the hands of a ring of highly aggressive paparazzi”.
That is more dramatic than the account given by New York police as well as the taxi driver who picked up the couple and Ragland.
The driver, Sukhcharn Singh, said he would not characterise it as a chase and added that he was not afraid, although his passengers clearly were.
A police spokesperson acknowledged that the photographers posed a challenge but said that the three arrived at their destination on the Upper East Side without “reported collisions, summonses, injuries or arrests”.
The New York Police Department declined to comment on security deployment for high-profile visitors to the city. But an official with knowledge of the process said police do their own independent research and analysis of such visits, before deciding whether to provide additional security.
News coverage of the encounter, which was extravagant on both sides of the Atlantic, pointed out the discrepancies in the accounts of the episode. But on this occasion, the New York tabloids made more of it than their London counterparts, which ran front-page photos of the couple but not judgemental headlines.
The New York Post’s front-page banner said, “Duke (and Duchess) of Hazard,” while The Daily News said, “Scary Echo of Diana”.
Harry has lawsuits pending against the publishers of three London tabloids, The Daily Mail, The Daily Mirror and The Sun, which he accuses of invading his privacy by hacking his cellphone and other illicit methods.
Meghan won a case against the publisher of the Mail on Sunday for publishing a private letter she sent to her estranged father, Thomas Markle, at the time of her wedding.
In one of Harry’s cases, against Rupert Murdoch’s British newspaper group, Harry said the company paid a “huge sum of money” in 2020 to settle claims that its journalists hacked the cellphone of his older brother, Prince William. The company and Kensington Palace, William’s office, declined to comment.
The evidence of systematic hacking of the phones of celebrities, royals and others led to the Leveson Inquiry, a judicial inquest that resulted in publishers ending the practice of phone hacking. They also curbed the aggressiveness of photographers who follow celebrities and members of the royal family.
While paparazzi have shown a degree of restraint since being publicly shamed in Britain, they still have a fairly free hand in the United States, where they have faced less of a backlash against their methods.
In the Netflix documentary Harry & Meghan, the couple are depicted peering nervously out the windows of their SUV for photographers pursuing them, as they leave a parking garage and head to an event. The scene is set in Manhattan. — The New York Times