The 85% rule encourages us to accept that we may not give 100% at what we do, not out of laziness, but out of realism. — AFP
Productivity has become a key factor for most businesses. That’s why executives and managers often urge their teams to “give 100%” to meet this productivity imperative. However, some entrepreneurs and professional coaches recommend operating at 85% rather than 100% to optimise efficiency at work.
This so-called 85% rule involves not trying to maximise our abilities at all costs. It’s about accepting that we can’t give 110% in what we do – not out of laziness, but out of realism.
In fact, it’s often difficult to get to the end of your to-do list, because we tend to list tasks, whether professional or personal, that need to be completed as quickly as possible. As the days go by, these reminders grow so long that we’re tempted to add “finish the to-do list” to the endless list of current objectives.
However, it would be simpler and more pragmatic to assume that we won’t be able to complete all the tasks on our to-do lists. It would be better to concentrate on achieving 85% of them, for example, rather than striving to accomplish everything. And who knows? We might even find ourselves finishing our to-do list in record time, if we don’t put pressure on ourselves to do so.
This is the philosophy behind the 85% rule. Followers of this personal development method see it as a positive rejection of the quest to perform optimally. They believe that you’re more productive when you’re not trying to be.
And sports science might prove them right. In fact, a 2007 study reported that low-intensity training sessions made long-distance runners perform better than programmes which push them to give their all. In other words, they tended to run faster when not focused on achieving the best possible time.
Less, but better
This in itself might not be surprising. Indeed, contrary to what many CVs suggest, few people are capable of working well under pressure.
While the notion of “good stress” does exist, stress often has a negative impact on those who experience it, with symptoms ranging from extreme fatigue to digestive problems, loss of sleep, irritability, depression, and more.
This state of tension is detrimental to the physical and mental well-being of employees, especially if it is experienced regularly. And this is the case for 44% of working people worldwide, according to data from Gallup.
This phenomenon is so widespread in professional circles that there are a multitude of terms for describing states of chronic stress at work.
A number of factors contribute to employee stress, including excessive workloads, tensions with superiors and/or colleagues, lack of autonomy and... increased pressure to improve productivity. Indeed, modern management is based on a logic of results.
Employees are assessed on the basis of their ability to meet the objectives set by their superiors, rather than on the quality of the work done to achieve them.
Supporters of the 85% rule want to see a paradigm shift. They refuse to work themselves to death, keeping their effort levels in check to ensure that their work is recognised for its true worth. Some might be tempted to see this as a form of disengagement, rather than a desire to excel in one’s work without sinking into work-related stress.
“Instead of ‘maximum effort = maximum results,’ a better formula is: ‘optimal effort = maximum results.’ Less effort can actually lead to more success,” writes Greg McKeown, author of Essentialism: The Disciplined Pursuit of Less, in the Harvard Business Review.
So could it be time to rethink the very concept of productivity? – AFP Relaxnews
