As towers reach for the sky in London, some people are worrying about the city’s ancient roots.
SKYSCRAPERS are shooting up all over London, transforming a skyline once dominated by Big Ben and St Paul’s Cathedral. Some Londoners are delighted at their city’s “Manhattanisation” but others warn it risks losing its soul.
“The City of London was a place of intricate streets,” a “precious” urban pattern inherited from Georgian times (the 18th century), says Kieran Long, curator in contemporary architecture at the Victoria and Albert Museum.
“You must be very careful with what you put there,” he says. “Some of the high buildings have done damage to that.”
A new study has revealed that no fewer than 237 skyscrapers are being built or have permission to begin construction over the coming year across London.
“It’s going to change the face of London probably greater than at anytime in its history, really, apart from maybe when St Paul’s Cathedral was built,” says Peter Murray, head of New London Architecture, a design and planning think tank.
Finished in 1710, St Paul’s stands 111.3m tall – around a third of The Shard, Europe’s highest skyscraper, which towers over the once-gritty Southwark neighbourhood.
Long warns that places like the City of London and the West End are in danger of losing their character – a view not shared by passers-by at the “Walkie-Talkie”, one of the signature towers changing the face of the British capital. “I like them, I think they add character. They make London a bit more unusual,” says City worker Lucille Davis. Staring up at the skyscraper, Andy Arwood calls it “amazing”. “There are so many buildings in London which are boring and dull and someone has actually sat down with that and designed it. I think it’s brilliant!” he says.
London’s skyscraper boom has come as a surprise to city authorities too, since there is no central urban planning office for the capital and decisions are taken borough by borough. Murray says the wave of construction was approved in response to major population growth in London with around 100,000 people coming in every year, which could bring the city’s population to nearly 10 million by 2030 and around 13 million by 2050.
But while the architecture expert says some affordable housing is provided in the new buildings, he says the — “are really designed for wealthier people”.
“This is a total reversal to what we had in the 1960s and in the 1970s, where we built ugly concrete towers which were designed for poor people,” he says. In the new towers of glass, high-living apartments can go for tens of millions of pounds.
Billed as London’s most luxurious apartment block, the 36-storey “Heron”, for example, boasts a 557sqm penthouse which went on the market this year for £18mil (RM95mil).
London’s more original-looking skyscrapers have earned affectionate local nicknames like the “Walkie-Talkie”, by Uruguay’s Rafael Vinoly, or the curvaceous “Gherkin” by British architect Norman Foster.
One of the newest additions has been dubbed the “Cheesegrater” for its sloped profile, specifically designed to protect citywide views of St Paul’s.
A frequent criticism of high-rises, in urban planning terms, is their thick base which Long says “completely changes the character of the streets”.
By making local streets less hospitable, they can contribute to killing off independent shops, already few and far between in much of central London, in favour of sandwich joints for office workers, Long argues.
Rogers Stirk Harbour + Partners, the architects behind the “Cheesegrater”, sought to respond to such concerns by cutting back the structure to create a sunlit plaza below.
But a letter to The Observer newspaper earlier this year signed by intellectuals including sculptor Antony Gormley and author Alan Bennett described many other towers as “generic” eyesores.
“The skyline of London is out of control,” they warned. “Too many of these towers are of mediocre architectural quality and badly sited. Their generic designs threaten London’s unique character and identity”. – AFP