THE proposed takeover of IJM Corp Bhd
by Sunway Bhd has stirred one of the most talked-about corporate debates in the Malaysian market this year.
The way major shareholders are approaching the deal offers important insight into how institutional capital should behave in transformative transactions.
At a time when sentiment and politics can quickly overwhelm commercial logic, the measured response from Permodalan Nasional Bhd (PNB), articulated by Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Fadillah Yusof, deserves particular attention.
PNB has made clear that it will assess Sunway’s voluntary general offer on its commercial merits – focusing on intrinsic valuation, potential returns, governance and the broader strategic plan – rather than being swayed by external noise or headline politics.
The offer, launched on Jan 12, 2026, comprises 31.5 sen in cash and 0.501 new Sunway shares per IJM share, valuing the group at just over RM11bil.
This combination of cash and equity is precisely what makes the investment case intriguing.
While some critics have grumbled that the cash component could be higher, the equity element gives IJM shareholders an opportunity to ride along with a larger, diversified group that may be better positioned for long-term growth, particularly in property and infrastructure.
The combined entity could wield greater scale, command a stronger balance sheet and capture synergies that are difficult to realise in silos – factors that tomorrow’s investors and dividend-seekers are likely to value.
Such a prospect would also bode well for the Employees Provident Fund, IJM’s largest shareholder with a 20% stake.
What Fadillah’s comments underscore is that PNB, despite being a significant shareholder with just under 13.5 % of IJM, does not dictate the outcome on its own and will weigh the offer as any thoughtful steward of capital should.
Each shareholder will make an independent decision, and the offer’s success hinges on acceptance by more than 50% of IJM’s shareholders.
This approach cuts through the counterproductive noise, including sensationalised governance concerns and political disputes, and centres the debate on value creation.
For PNB and other institutional investors, the question isn’t whether the bid is popular, but whether it makes sense relative to IJM’s intrinsic worth and future prospects under a merged umbrella.
There is a strong argument that being part of a larger, more resilient group could enhance long-term dividend flows and capital growth more than a narrow focus on short-term cash premium.
In an era when Malaysian equities sometimes struggle for compelling narratives, a consolidation of this scale – properly vetted and embraced for its strategic merits – would be refreshing.
It reminds investors that well-considered mergers can unlock value not through hype, but by enhancing competitive position, operational strength and future returns for long-term holders.
That is the kind of disciplined investing the market needs.
