High demand: A file picture showing barges loaded with coal. There are some signs that coal imports are starting to increase. — AP
THERMAL coal may end up as a major beneficiary of escalating hostilities in the Middle East, as the fuel used to generate electricity becomes cheaper than one of its main competitors liquefied natural gas (LNG).
Much of the focus of the potential fallout from the conflict between Israel, and now the United States, and Iran is the threat to crude oil and refined fuels shipped through the Strait of Hormuz.
But all of Qatar’s LNG also goes through the narrow waterway separating the gulfs of Persia and Oman, and this amounts to almost 20% of the global seaborne supply of the super-chilled fuel.
While there has yet to be any disruption of Qatar’s LNG, the mere threat that Iran may attempt to block the strait or attack shipping has seen spot LNG prices rise in Asia, the biggest market.
LNG for delivery to North Asia rose to US$14 per million British thermal units (mmBtu) in the week to June 20, a four-month high and up from US$12.6 the prior week.
The weekly price assessment also came before the United States joined Israel’s bombing campaign against Iran, with President Donald Trump claiming on June 21 that the strikes had “completely and totally obliterated” three nuclear facilities.
The involvement of the United States makes it more likely that LNG prices will continue to rise to reflect the increased risk premium.
But even at the current level, LNG is no longer competitive against thermal coal in the two major markets where fuel-switching can occur – Japan and South Korea.
Advantage of coal
The price of Australian thermal coal with an energy content of 6,000 kilocalories per kg at Newcastle Port rose to a four-month high of US$109.41 a tonne in the week to June 20, according to data from globalCOAL.
This is the grade of thermal coal most used by Japan and South Korea, as well as Taiwan.
Using LSEG data to convert the price of coal into million British thermal units showed that Australia’s Newcastle benchmark is currently around US$12.18 per mmBtu, or a 13% discount to the spot LNG price.
The most recent low for spot LNG was in early May when the price dipped to US$11 per mmBtu, at which point it was cheaper than Newcastle coal, which was US$11.47.
But spot LNG prices have rallied harder than those for coal in recent weeks, a trend that is likely to continue for as long as tensions remain high in the Middle East.
Since it has only been 10 days since Israel started its bombing campaign against Iran, it’s still too early to see a sustained trend in the volumes of coal being purchased by Japan and South Korea.
However, there are some signs that coal imports are starting to increase, with commodity analysts Kpler tracking Japan’s arrivals at 6.57 million tonnes in June, up from 6.39 million in May.
More interestingly, Kpler is already estimating that Japan’s thermal coal imports will jump to 7.23 million tonnes, which would be the most since March.
Revised higher
It’s likely that the July number will be revised higher as more cargoes are assessed.
There is also an element of seasonality to Japan’s thermal coal imports, which tend to rise in both the winter and summer peak demand periods.
This means it will be important to look at the year-on-year changes to see if Asia’s third-biggest coal buyer is indeed buying more of the fuel.
Japan imported 10.05 million tonnes of thermal coal in July last year, and given that the volume already assessed for this coming July is more than 70% of that total, it’s likely that imports next month will show an increase from July 2024.
It’s also worth noting that Asia’s two biggest coal importers, China and India, don’t have much ability to swap LNG for coal given their limited use of natural gas for power generation.
Reducing dependency
But on a longer-term note, both countries are likely to view the current unrest in the Middle East as another compelling reason to reduce dependency on imported crude oil and LNG as rapidly as possible.
If that means using their vast domestic reserves of coal, supplemented by imports, to electrify transportation at a faster pace, it’s likely that this is a path they will pursue irrespective of climate change concerns. — Reuters
Clyde Russell is a columnist for Reuters. The views expressed here are the writer’s own.
