European banks face indigenous calls to end Amazon oil trade


Tipping point: Sandbags are seen piled up against a damaged oil pipeline about 25km from Tena. The Amazon rainforest faces worsening wildfires and clearing for agriculture and mining. — Reuters

LONDON: European banks committed to backing action on climate change face allegations of double standards from indigenous groups in Ecuador after a report named them as major players in the trade in oil from the Amazon rainforest.

Stand.earth and Amazon Watch said ING, Credit Suisse, Natixis, BNP Paribas, UBS and Rabobank were the largest backers in the shipment of about US$10bil of Ecuadorian crude to US refineries over the last decade.

Each of the banks identified, having reviewed the report, referred to environmental commitments they had made, such as to back the 2015 Paris climate accord, protect forests and support United Nations sustainable development goals.

But indigenous communities resisting oil industry plans to push deeper into their territories said any bank backing the trade from the Amazon was complicit in growing threats to the world’s largest rainforest.

“The banks are engaging in double standards, ” Marlon Vargas, president of the Confederation of Indigenous Nationalities of the Ecuadorian Amazon, told Reuters.

“To devastate the Amazon is to devastate life itself.”

Spanning nine countries in South America, the Amazon rainforest faces worsening wildfires and clearing for agriculture and mining. About 15%-17% of the original forest has been destroyed, mostly since the 1970s, scientists say.

The rainforest plays a vital role in regulating the Earth’s climate by absorbing carbon dioxide, which is one of the main greenhouse gases responsible for global warming. Scientists warn further damage could push the Amazon past a tipping point where it becomes a major emitter of the gas.

Rabobank, of the Netherlands, said in a statement it had stopped financing Ecuadorian crude cargoes earlier this year, adding that the concerns raised were “in line with our policy commitments and part of the due diligence in our trade finance operations”.

Both France’s Natixis and Dutch bank ING pledged to look into the concerns raised in the report. Swiss bank UBS said it already had declined some crude oil transactions from the region due to concerns about indigenous land rights.

Credit Suisse said the issues raised did not represent any breach of any of its oil and gas lending policies and it regularly reviewed its policies on environmental and social risks.

French bank BNP Paribas said the report’s methodology was “opaque” and questioned how the authors had arrived at estimates of banks’ financial exposures.

The report also said Deutsche Bank had played a smaller role, including financing a cargo of crude from Ecuador in April.

The bank, which last month said it was tightening its policies for fossil fuel lending, declined to comment.

As climate change intensifies, European banks have increasingly restricted backing for some heavily-polluting projects, such as extracting oil from Canadian tar sands or the Arctic, and coal-fired power plants.

But providing the specialist financing that enables a global trade in cargoes of oil, natural gas and coal – known as trade finance – is coming under greater scrutiny.

“As banks commit to align their financial services to the Paris goals, this opens up a new frontier of reputational risk, ” said Bruce Duguid, head of stewardship at British asset manager Federated Hermes, which advises clients with more than US$1 trillion in assets.

Much of the trade in Amazon oil passes through banks or their subsidiaries based in Switzerland, which is a major hub for the global oil trade, the report said.

In Ecuador, which depends on oil exports pumped mostly by state-owned Petroamazonas for a third of its public sector revenues, indigenous groups say that concessions have often been awarded without their consent.

An Ecuadorian court ruled last year that the Waorani people had not been properly consulted and banned drilling on half a million acres of their territory.

Last week, Amnesty International published an appeal for the protection of women in the Ecuadorian Amazon who say they have faced death threats for resisting oil extraction, mining and logging. It is unclear who is behind those threats.

“Banks need to respect indigenous rights, “ Tyson Miller, who heads the forest programme at Stand.earth, said. “They are violating the spirit of their own environmental policies.”

Fears over the impact of oil extraction in the Amazon were heightened in April when a pipeline ruptured, depriving 27,000 indigenous people of their main water source.

And plans to drill hundreds of additional oil wells in Ecuador’s Yasuni National Park, which sits atop a major concession, have caused alarm. — Reuters

Article type: metered
User Type: anonymous web
User Status:
Campaign ID: 1
Cxense type: free
User access status: 3

oil and gas ,

   

Next In Business News

AirAsia Group expects 'clarity' on fundraising in 2-3 months
Pertama Digital keen to apply for digital banking license
KLCI holds firm as glove shares stay bullish
Ether plunges 10% a day after hitting record high
Petronas prices US$3bil bond offering
Ringgit opens weaker as greenback strengthens
Japan's factory activity improves in April but more virus measures loom
Quick take: BHIC rises 9% to hit 3-week high
Mild profit-taking on FBM KLCI
Quick take: Mah Sing jumps 10% in active trade

Stories You'll Enjoy


Vouchers