SOMETHING strange happened in the US stock market on Tuesday.
No, it wasn’t that the S&P 500 crossed 3,000 for the first time in almost three months, generating a yelp of joy from the White House and groans from Wall Street veterans who remain perplexed at the seeming disconnect between financial markets and the American economy.
Rather, the most unusual part of the latest rally is that bank shares clearly led the advance.
As of last week, Bloomberg’s 18-company S&P 500 Banks Index was down more than 40% in 2020, trailing the broader stock market by an almost unprecedented degree since the coronavirus pandemic shut down the world’s largest economy.
However, the index soared 9% on Tuesday, far and away a bigger gain than any of the other 23 industry groups.
A simple ratio of this bank index to the broad S&P 500 shows the extent to which financials have been beaten down so far in 2020 relative to other segments of the stock market. The gauge fell on May 13 to a level seen only twice before in data going back three decades, both in March 2009. The banks swiftly rebounded in the following months as the US recession officially drew to a close in June of that year.
As investors weigh the drastic gains on Wall Street against the backdrop of widespread unemployment and shuttered small businesses on Main Street, the performance of bank stocks may prove to be a crucial barometer of whether markets can sustain their exuberance.
Few analysts dispute that shares of financial companies are cheap on a relative basis – but sometimes prices are depressed for good reasons. Inexpensiveness alone isn’t a compelling enough reason to expect banks to bounce back as they did in 2009.
Instead, perhaps more than any other industry, a lasting rally will come down to investors’ conviction in a sharp and sustained economic recovery. Investors have a few obvious reasons to be wary of US banks.
For one, long-term interest rates are near record lows while traders have started to wager on negative short-term rates, even as Federal Reserve officials repeatedly question the policy.
All this points to lower net interest income, a crucial metric that reflects the spread between what a company earns on its loans and what it pays on its deposits.
Meanwhile, large banks have already halted share buybacks, and minutes from April’s Federal Open Market Committee meeting revealed that policy makers are debating whether they should also restrict their ability to pay dividends to shareholders during the pandemic.
Whether those downsides merit a US$1 trillion wipeout, akin to the 2008 financial crisis, is not so clear cut.
As Bloomberg News’s Lu Wang and Felice Maranz reported, at that time the financial industry’s earnings worsened for eight consecutive quarters, but analysts only expect profit declines to last half as long this time around.
Banks are broadly considered to be well capitalised – certainly much more than they were 12 years ago when they had to be bailed out by the government.
JPMorgan Chase & Co chief executive officer Jamie Dimon expressed confidence in mid-April, when the outlook was even more uncertain than today, that the biggest US bank can handle “really adverse consequences.”
He said on Tuesday that the United States could see a “fairly rapid recovery.”
“The government has been pretty responsive, large companies have the wherewithal, hopefully we’re keeping the small ones alive, ” he said at a virtual conference hosted by Deutsche Bank AG.
It’s far too soon to declare an “all clear” on the economy, but it’s starting to look as if actions from the Fed and Congress at least helped the US clear the low bar of avoiding the worst-case scenario.
The numbers are still awful, especially when it comes to unemployment, but data released Tuesday showed an unexpected increase in new-home sales in April compared with those a month earlier.
Broadly, Citigroup Inc’s economic surprise index is off its lows, indicating that recent figures aren’t quite as bad as analysts expected.“The economic data have been so darn grim lately with job losses in the tens of millions that the green shoots of optimism from better consumer confidence and new home sales are welcome, ” Chris Rupkey, chief financial economist at MUFG Union Bank NA, wrote on Tuesday.
“We still can’t see a V-shaped recovery, but at least this is looking like the shortest recession in history which will be measured in months not years.”
If that’s the case, investors will likely look back on the past few weeks as a time when bank stocks became far too cheap compared with other parts of the market.
Seemingly huge rally
Yet Tuesday’s seemingly huge rally still leaves financial companies worth far less than before the pandemic, and it seems reasonable to expect they’ll remain that way for a while. After all, it’s anyone’s guess just how many loans will end up going bad and saddle banks with losses.
There are far more moving parts to JPMorgan’s bottom line than that of, say, Netflix Inc, which fell 3% on Tuesday, the most in almost a month.
It’s never a good idea to read too much into one optimistic trading day, especially coming out of a US holiday weekend in which many Americans probably got a taste of “normal” pre-pandemic activities. But on its face, Tuesday looks as if it could be something of a turning point for bank shares. The follow-through will indicate if they were just too cheap to pass up, or if the economy truly is on the mend.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.Brian Chappatta is a Bloomberg opinion columnist covering debt markets. He previously covered bonds for Bloomberg News. He is also a CFA charterholder.
Did you find this article insightful?