Reginald Tongol (left) and Antonio Bucoy. - Photo from Regie Tongol & Associates Law and Communications Facebook page and video screengrab
MANILA: The House of Representatives’ decision not to receive the entry of appearance made by Vice President Sara Duterte’s lawyers for the impeachment trial should not result in any issue, prosecution spokesman Antonio Bucoy said.
In his first-ever press briefing held on Tuesday (June 17), Bucoy was asked why the House supposedly refused to receive the entry of appearance sent by the defence counsel on Monday (June 16) afternoon.
Bucoy admitted that he does not know the exact reason, but noted that this should not be an issue, because the phrase “tender copy refuse to receive” indicates that it was as if the document was received.
“I would like to clarify. I do not know the reason why. But the bottom line is that nobody was hurt, there was no damage. Because when they tendered the service of the entry of appearance, tender means you are constructively served. So, regardless of whether they accept it or not, the purpose was served because it was tendered. So as if you received it,” he explained.
“‘When it is tendered, the document is left with the chamber. The term ‘tender’ was used because they did not acknowledge that they had already received it. Nonetheless, like what I said, no harm, no foul. Nobody was hurt here, nobody was aggrieved,” he added.
According to Bucoy, he is not sure whether the recent circumstances surrounding the impeachment proceedings have led to an impediment — which may be a reason why the House did not receive the entry of appearance.
“Now I do not know if there was an impediment or none that’s why the entry was not accepted, or what is the exact reason why it was not accepted. But like I said earlier, no harm, no foul because the service […] was tendered so as if it was received. There is no damage,” he added.
On Monday night, Senate impeachment court spokesperson Reginald Tongol confirmed that Duterte’s counsel has entered its appearance, with 16 lawyers defending her — including those from the Fortun Narvasa & Salazar law firm.
However, Tongol said that the House was “indicated in page 3 to have been copy furnished as well today at 3.42pm, but has a note ‘Tender Copy refuse to receive.’”
Tongol said in an interview with DZMM on Tuesday that the House’s refusal to accept the document may delay the impeachment proceedings.
Duterte was impeached last February 5, after 215 lawmakers filed and signed a verified impeachment complaint against her. The articles of impeachment were immediately sent to the Senate as the Article XI, Section 3(4) of the 1987 Constitution states that a trial should proceed forthwith if one-thirds of House members file the complaint.
As one-third of 306 House members is 102, the requirement was fulfilled. However, trial did not start as the articles of impeachment were not sent to the Senate plenary before session adjourned for the election season break.
And when the proceedings were supposed to start last June 3, the Senate eventually approved a motion to remand the articles back to the House, due to alleged constitutional infirmities.
The House prosecution team, however, said that they will defer acceptance of the returned articles, and will file a motion seeking clarification as one of the Senate’s requests — a certification from the 20th Congress that they will pursue the impeachment — cannot be complied with now.
Duterte’s impeachment was hinged on different issues, like allegations of confidential fund misuse within her offices which were uncovered during the hearing of the House committee on good government and public accountability, and threats to have President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., First Lady Liza Araneta-Marcos, and Romualdez assassinated. - Philippine Daily Inquirer/ANN
