Tang Ngok-kwan (centre), one of core members of the Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China, and Medina Chow Lau Wah-chun (left), mother of Chow Hang-tung, also core member, leaving the Court of Final Appeal in Hong Kong, on March 6, 2025. - AP
HONG KONG: Hong Kong's top court ruled in favour of three Tiananmen vigil organisers on Thursday (March 6), quashing the activists' prison terms over their refusal to submit information to national security police.
Three group leaders -- Chow Hang-tung, Tang Ngok-kwan and Tsui Hon-kwong -- were jailed, each for four and a half months, after they refused.
But five top judges on Thursday sided with the trio and said the prosecution "made it impossible for them to have a fair trial".
"The court unanimously allows the appeals," Chief Justice Andrew Cheung said.
Tang, who had finished serving his prison term, said the ruling was a vindication of his group and urged people not to forget the victims of the Tiananmen crackdown.
"This is hugely gratifying for those who support the Alliance and its volunteers," he told reporters.
Prosecutors argued that the security law required people to hand over information when the police chief "reasonably believed" they were foreign agents, without needing to prove it in court.
But top judges said that was a misreading of the law and the police ought to have proven that the Alliance was in fact a foreign agent when issuing the demand.
"There was no attempt at offering such proof," they wrote.
Judges also blasted prosecutors for heavily redacting evidence that purported to show the Alliance's overseas links, leaving "pages often completely covered in black ink".
"The striking feature of the exhibits is that a very large part of each document was redacted," they wrote.
Defendant Chow, a lawyer-turned-activist, remains behind bars awaiting trial in a separate subversion trial which could land her in jail for life.
In a separate ruling on Thursday, the same Hong Kong court ruled against activist Tam Tak-chi over a colonial-era sedition offence.
Tam, who is serving a jail sentence of more than three years, argued that prosecutors needed to prove he intended to incite violence.
Last year, Hong Kong authorities revamped the offence so it explicitly states that people can be convicted of sedition even if no intent to incite public disorder or violence was proven. - AFP
