A leading Beijing think tank has lowered the ranking positions of Australia and the United States as destinations for Chinese outbound investment, in its latest assessment of 114 countries, underscoring the risk to investors amid deteriorating relations with the two countries.
The government-supported Institute of World Economics and Politics at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS) on Thursday slashed its ranking of Australia – an investment darling in previous lists – by 12 places to No 15, just days after the first anniversary of their ongoing trade conflict that started with Australia calling for an independent investigation into the origin of the coronavirus without first consulting China.
However, Australia, as the major provider of iron ore to China, remained in the low-risk “AA” category, CASS said.
Do you have questions about the biggest topics and trends from around the world? Get the answers with SCMP Knowledge, our new platform of curated content with explainers, FAQs, analyses and infographics brought to you by our award-winning team.
The fall was mainly due to the rapid deterioration in relations between Beijing and Canberra, and partly because of Australia’s weakening debt-repayment capability, the institute said at a briefing in Beijing.
The coronavirus pandemic did not change the overall investment rankings, but many developed countries scored lower in terms of their relations with China due to a number of hot-button issues, including alleged human rights violations in Xinjiang, Hong Kong’s security law and rising military pressure on Taiwan, according to the annual evaluation.
The rankings are widely referenced by Chinese businesses, which have strong incentives to utilise overseas energy, raw materials and labour, while tapping emerging markets and bypassing the trade barriers of developed countries. The political rankings were based on equal weightings of five criteria: political risks, economic fundamentals, debt-repayment capabilities, social stability and relationships with China.
Unsurprisingly, in ranking China’s relations, those with the US fell to dead last on the 114-country list, down from 103rd last year. Relations with Australia plunged to 89th, down from 50th last year, while those with Canada fell to 98th from 90th. The rankings were based on an overall evaluation by dozens of Chinese analysts from the CASS, Renmin University and other organisations.
Thursday’s release came less than a day after the latest tense exchange between China and Australia, with Canberra revoking Victoria state’s participation in the Belt and Road Initiative – Beijing’s top foreign policy initiative, which was unveiled by President Xi Jinping in 2013 to enhance infrastructure connectivity but has been widely interpreted as China’s Marshall Plan to project its political and economic influence.
A statement from the Chinese embassy in Australia subsequently expressed “strong displeasure and resolute opposition” to the move.
“This is another unreasonable and provocative move taken by the Australian side against China,” the embassy said. “It is bound to further damage bilateral relations, and [Australia] will only end up hurting itself.”
Chinese investment in Australia plunged by 61 per cent to A$1 billion (US$773 million) last year, with 86 per cent of that total coming from Chinese companies already established in Australia, according to data from the Australian National University.
Overall, Germany is now ranked as the best destination for outbound Chinese investment, followed by Switzerland, Luxembourg, South Korea and New Zealand.
The United Kingdom was downgraded to the medium-risk level of “A” from its low-risk rating last year, and is now 23rd on the list. The US remains a medium-risk destination and now ranks No 35, eight places lower than last year.
The CASS’s head of investment risk research, Gao Lingyun, attributed the fall in the US ranking to its domestic political uncertainties, including internal political struggles, failures in its pandemic control and rising populism.
“China-US relations remain tense, investments in the US are largely stalled, and Chinese companies face lots of difficulties in their efforts to be listed in the US,” he said at the briefing.
Beijing has spent years diversifying away from developed countries by encouraging more investment in belt and road countries.
Its non-financial outbound direct investment in these regions rose 18.3 per cent, year on year, to US$17.8 billion in 2020, accounting for 16.2 per cent of the country’s total outbound investment of US$110 billion, according to the Ministry of Commerce.
However, the think tank warned that investors must be aware of the risks in some of these nations.
Singapore is the only belt and road country that is regarded as a “low risk” for investors. Nine others are labelled high-risk countries, including Iran and Turkey. India ranks 83rd, just three places away from the high-risk category.
At the bottom of the list of 114 countries are Sudan, Iraq and Venezuela.
A recent study by Boston University’s Global Development Policy Centre said Beijing has been cutting back on its lending to some of the regions involved in its Belt and Road Initiative.
For instance, Beijing’s two global policy banks – the Export-Import Bank of China and China Development Bank – made no new financing commitments to Latin America or Caribbean governments in 2020 for the first time in 16 years.
At the same time, loan commitments to Africa dropped to US$7 billion in 2019, down 30 per cent year on year, the centre said.
More from South China Morning Post:
- China-Australia relations: lobster exporters look to ‘reboot’ in alternative markets after years of relying on Chinese demand
- China urged to address global digital tax rules to avoid ‘new tariff war’ as G20 push for July consensus
- How a sweeping US infrastructure plan might spur financial havoc in China
- China vows ‘bigger contribution’ in helping poor countries, with an emphasis on profitable infrastructure projects
- China’s Belt and Road Initiative faces increased political risk in participating countries, report warns