Lawyer Tan Jeh Yaw, who supervised the six-month training stint of Kuoh Hao Teng, had made the unusual move of objecting to the trainee's application for admission to the Bar.
Tan claimed Kuoh played computer games and watched movies during office hours and did not complete the work assigned to him - allegations the trainee denied.
But in a twist, it emerged that Tan, the sole proprietor of his firm, did not have the necessary qualifications to take on trainees.
This meant that even if Tan had not objected, Kuoh could not have been admitted under that application.
In grounds of decision released last Friday (April 9), Justice Choo Han Teck questioned whether the reasons given by Tan for his objections were true and whether other trainees of Tan have been admitted to the Bar.
The judge said: "It is remarkable that an application for admission to the Bar should raise so many questions yet yield so few answers."
At least 100 such applications are made each year and "almost all pass uneventfully", he noted.
The Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) told The Straits Times it takes a serious view of the issues raised by the judge. Its spokesman said: "We are looking into the matter and will take all appropriate action."
A Law Society spokesman said it will work with the AGC and the Singapore Institute of Legal Education "to ensure that practice trainees continue to receive training from properly qualified persons and with minimum disruption".
The three bodies are in charge of supervising applications for admission to the Bar.
Kuoh, who graduated from the University of Bristol in 2017, completed his training under Tan on July 11, 2019.
On the final day of his training, Kuoh presented the documents for his application to Tan, who signed them on July 26 that year.
Among the documents was a checklist for a supervisor to check off the areas of training that a trainee had undergone.
Kuoh felt that Tan had not checked the list correctly. He prepared an amended list that he felt accurately reflected his training, and sent it to Tan.
Not having received comments on the changes, Kuoh submitted the documents on July 29, 2019.
Luo's investigation revealed that Tan had a practising certificate in force for only two years and 11 months in the relevant period.
Affidavits filed to the court also suggested that there were other trainees at Tan's firm.
Kuoh told ST that his primary focus now is to secure a position to practise as a lawyer.
He said he has submitted representations to the AGC to retract the stern warning for what he said was a "misunderstanding". - The Straits Times/ANN