Trainee lawyer's bid to be called to Singapore Bar raises questions; judge calls for inquiry


At least a hundred such applications are made each year and "almost all pass uneventfully", noted the judge. - The Straits Times/ANN

SINGAPORE, April 11 (The Straits Times/ANN): An application by a trainee lawyer to be called to the Bar - usually an uneventful process - raised so many questions that a High Court judge said the matter should be "swiftly and vigorously" pursued by the relevant authorities.

Lawyer Tan Jeh Yaw, who supervised the six-month training stint of Kuoh Hao Teng, had made the unusual move of objecting to the trainee's application for admission to the Bar.

Tan claimed Kuoh played computer games and watched movies during office hours and did not complete the work assigned to him - allegations the trainee denied.

But in a twist, it emerged that Tan, the sole proprietor of his firm, did not have the necessary qualifications to take on trainees.

This meant that even if Tan had not objected, Kuoh could not have been admitted under that application.

In grounds of decision released last Friday (April 9), Justice Choo Han Teck questioned whether the reasons given by Tan for his objections were true and whether other trainees of Tan have been admitted to the Bar.

The judge said: "It is remarkable that an application for admission to the Bar should raise so many questions yet yield so few answers."

At least 100 such applications are made each year and "almost all pass uneventfully", he noted.

The Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) told The Straits Times it takes a serious view of the issues raised by the judge. Its spokesman said: "We are looking into the matter and will take all appropriate action."

A Law Society spokesman said it will work with the AGC and the Singapore Institute of Legal Education "to ensure that practice trainees continue to receive training from properly qualified persons and with minimum disruption".

The three bodies are in charge of supervising applications for admission to the Bar.

Kuoh, who graduated from the University of Bristol in 2017, completed his training under Tan on July 11, 2019.

On the final day of his training, Kuoh presented the documents for his application to Tan, who signed them on July 26 that year.

Among the documents was a checklist for a supervisor to check off the areas of training that a trainee had undergone.

Kuoh felt that Tan had not checked the list correctly. He prepared an amended list that he felt accurately reflected his training, and sent it to Tan.

Not having received comments on the changes, Kuoh submitted the documents on July 29, 2019.

Luo's investigation revealed that Tan had a practising certificate in force for only two years and 11 months in the relevant period.

Affidavits filed to the court also suggested that there were other trainees at Tan's firm.

Kuoh told ST that his primary focus now is to secure a position to practise as a lawyer.

He said he has submitted representations to the AGC to retract the stern warning for what he said was a "misunderstanding". - The Straits Times/ANN

Article type: metered
User Type: anonymous web
User Status:
Campaign ID: 46
Cxense type: free
User access status: 3

Singapore , Man , Application , To Be Lawyer , Bar , Questioned

   

Next In Aseanplus News

Another Thai protest leader says has Covid-19 after weeks in jail
UN revises global growth forecast as China and US rebound
Nearly 3,000 in Brunei vaccinated under opt-in programme
AmCham survey flags potential expatriate exodus from Hong Kong
Vietnam reports 34 new Covid-19 cases
Vietnamese in Laos help community fight Covid-19
Thai PM wants Covid-19 vaccinations to become top priority
China professor calls for million-yuan reward to boost birth rates
Asian markets suffer further as inflation data looms
Vietnam agency seeks to build airport on disputed Spratly islands: media

Stories You'll Enjoy


Vouchers