Regulate global investment disputes inonomy

RECENT public opinion concerning Investor State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) provisions, including those discussed in recent negotiations of the Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA), centres on a number of issues.

Notwithstanding, an objective analysis of the system and the need for a paradigm evolution is essential before there can be criticism of a system that has provided the modern legal framework for foreign investment across the globe.

Get 30% off with our ads free Premium Plan

Monthly Plan


Annual Plan


Billed as RM103.60/year

1 month

Free Trial

For new subscribers only

Cancel anytime. No ads. Auto-renewal. Unlimited access to the web and app. Personalised features. Members rewards.
Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Opinion , Letters


Next In Letters

Retirement wishes for Wee Wern
Dispelling first-day-at-school blues
Make Graduate Programme initiative more impactful
Ensuring safety in commercial transport industry
Start now to be ready for VMY 2026
A deadly publicity stunt
Back to old school tactics
Allow reforms to be implemented
Easing the bite of tax hike
Alert the public on danger of sleeping in closed car

Others Also Read