Regulate global investment disputes inonomy


RECENT public opinion concerning Investor State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) provisions, including those discussed in recent negotiations of the Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA), centres on a number of issues.

Notwithstanding, an objective analysis of the system and the need for a paradigm evolution is essential before there can be criticism of a system that has provided the modern legal framework for foreign investment across the globe.

Subscribe now for a chance to win your dream holiday!

Monthly Plan

RM13.90/month

Annual Plan

RM12.33/month

Billed as RM148.00/year

1 month

Free Trial

For new subscribers only


Cancel anytime. No ads. Auto-renewal. Unlimited access to the web and app. Personalised features. Members rewards.
Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Opinion , Letters

   

Next In Letters

Making Malaysia a global leader in biopharma industry
New chapter for nursing
Senior citizens adrift in a digital world
Apex court decision a relief for developers
Recipe for English revival
Hold those in charge accountable
Reminder on the vital role of mangroves
Should sign language be taught in schools?
To pay or not to pay the HRDF levy for training
Cashless transactions: Have we gone too far, too fast?

Others Also Read