Regulate global investment disputes inonomy


RECENT public opinion concerning Investor State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) provisions, including those discussed in recent negotiations of the Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA), centres on a number of issues.

Notwithstanding, an objective analysis of the system and the need for a paradigm evolution is essential before there can be criticism of a system that has provided the modern legal framework for foreign investment across the globe.

Subscribe or renew your subscriptions to win prizes worth up to RM68,000!

Monthly Plan

RM13.90/month

Annual Plan

RM12.33/month

Billed as RM148.00/year

1 month

Free Trial

For new subscribers only


Cancel anytime. No ads. Auto-renewal. Unlimited access to the web and app. Personalised features. Members rewards.
Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!

Opinion , Letters

   

Next In Letters

Flood relief efforts should include pets
Safety gaps in application process for credit cards
Review cut-off age policy for EPF contributors
Call to regulate adventure tourism
Culture of bullying can be eradicated
Timeless companions that must be respected
Holistic approach to education
Aim for fairer premium adjustments
No urgency in reviving local elections
Uphill task to achieve road safety plan target

Others Also Read